CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW X1 vs Mazda CX-60
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW X1 vs Mazda CX-60

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

BMW X1: we're still completing width, height, kerb weight, warranty and ground clearance, plus 4 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecBMWMazda
Price (RRP)$43,500$44,240
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power110kW138kW
0-100 km/h9.7s7.4s
Fuel Economy7.5 L/100km
Boot Space420L570L
Towing1,400kg1,800kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the BMW X1 & Mazda CX-60

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BMW X1 starts from $43,500 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $44,240. That makes the BMW X1 the more affordable entry point by $740.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $47,850 and $48,664 respectively.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mazda CX-60 counters with Apple CarPlay that the BMW X1 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The BMW X1 uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.7 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 has the clear power advantage at 138kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW X1 measures 4,450mm long on a 2,760mm wheelbase, 290mm shorter than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,740mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 420L in the BMW X1 and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 150L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,400kg. That 400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m diameter

Good

Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
10.8m
Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
Mazda CX-60 Turning circle · Ø 10.8 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.2 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW X1 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-60 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW X1 and Mazda CX-60?

The BMW X1 is the cheapest at $43,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-60 by $740.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-60 uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-60 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-60 makes the most power at 138kW. The Mazda CX-60 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs