CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›BYD M9 vs Skoda Enyaq Coupe
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BYD M9 vs Skoda Enyaq Coupe

Two electric cars go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

BYD M9: we're still completing height, turning circle and fuel consumption.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecBYDSkoda
Price (RRP)$72,990$70,990
Fuel typePlug-in HybridElectric
Range (WLTP)145km561km
Battery36.6 kWh82 kWh
Electric range145km—
Power218kW210kW
0-100 km/h8.5s6.7s
Max DC Charge73kW135kW
Fuel Economy7.3 kWh/100km (as hybrid)—
Boot Space470L570L
Towing1,500kg2,000kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars
V2LYes (6kW)No

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the BYD M9 & Skoda Enyaq Coupe

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BYD M9 starts from $72,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Enyaq Coupe opens at $70,990. That makes the Skoda Enyaq Coupe the more affordable entry point by $2,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $80,289 and $78,089 respectively.

The Skoda Enyaq Coupe currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The BYD M9 does not: plug-in hybrids lost the fbt exemption on 1 april 2025.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

36.6kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

35 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 73kW · 0–80%

30 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 73kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

82kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 19m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 135kW · 0–80%

36 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 135kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BYD M9 stands out with ventilated seats and V2L — features our data doesn't list for the Skoda Enyaq Coupe. The Skoda Enyaq Coupe counters with head-up display. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The BYD M9 runs a pure electric powertrain producing 218kW and 315Nm of torque, sent through a 1 spd auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq Coupe counters with its electric setup making 210kW and 545Nm, paired to its gearbox driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.7 seconds.

The BYD M9 has the clear power advantage at 218kW vs 210kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Skoda Enyaq Coupe is 1.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 36.6kWh (BYD M9) vs 82kWh (Skoda Enyaq Coupe), giving WLTP ranges of 145km and 561km. DC fast charging peaks at 73kW (BYD M9) vs 135kW (Skoda Enyaq Coupe).

Space & Comfort

The BYD M9 measures 5,145mm long on a 3,045mm wheelbase, 487mm longer than the Skoda Enyaq Coupe at 4,658mm (2,766mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD M9 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 470L in the BYD M9 and 570L in the Skoda Enyaq Coupe, giving the Skoda Enyaq Coupe a 100L advantage. The BYD M9 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Skoda Enyaq Coupe leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m diameter

Excellent

Skoda Enyaq Coupe 85 Sportline
9.3m
←
Skoda Enyaq Coupe 85 Sportline
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3 m Ø

Excellent

9.0 m road
Skoda Enyaq Coupe Turning circle · Ø 9.3 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Clears the U-turn in one swing

Needs about 7.5 m of road; you have 9.0 m.

✓

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

✓

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (BYD M9) vs 7 years (Skoda Enyaq Coupe). The Skoda Enyaq Coupe has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BYD M9 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Enyaq Coupe if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Enyaq Coupe takes 8 of 10 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Skoda Enyaq Coupe has a clear edge. The Skoda Enyaq Coupe adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BYD M9 and Skoda Enyaq Coupe?

The Skoda Enyaq Coupe is the cheapest at $70,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BYD M9 by $2,000.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Skoda Enyaq Coupe holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for BYD M9, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Enyaq Coupe has the largest boot at 570L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Enyaq Coupe has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Enyaq Coupe has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The BYD M9 makes the most power at 218kW. The Skoda Enyaq Coupe is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All People Movers · All Coupe SUVs · Best electric cars · Best electric SUVs