CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 7 vs Mazda CX-5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 7 vs Mazda CX-5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryMazda
Price (RRP)$27,500$39,990
Power108kW140kW
0-100 km/h9.5s8.7s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km7.3 L/100km
Boot Space475L438L
Towing1,500kg1,800kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 7 starts from $27,500 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-5 opens at $39,990. That makes the Chery Tiggo 7 the more affordable entry point by $12,490.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $30,250 and $43,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Chery Tiggo 7 and Mazda CX-5 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 7 and 95% for the Mazda CX-5.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery Tiggo 7 and 6 in the Mazda CX-5.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 7 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-5 gets a 15.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 7 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed dct to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-5 responds with a Petrol making 140kW and 252Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.

The Mazda CX-5 has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 108kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-5 is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 7 measures 4,540mm long on a 2,661mm wheelbase, 35mm shorter than the Mazda CX-5 at 4,575mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 475L in the Chery Tiggo 7 and 438L in the Mazda CX-5, giving the Chery Tiggo 7 a 37L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-5 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.2m

Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.0mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 7 Urban
11.2m
Worst
Chery Tiggo 7
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-5
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Chery Tiggo 7 and $2,081/year for the Mazda CX-5. That is a $114 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 7.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Chery Tiggo 7) vs $2,081 (Mazda CX-5). The Chery Tiggo 7 saves you roughly $114 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 7) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-5). The Chery Tiggo 7 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-5 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 7 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 7 will save you roughly $114 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 7 has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 7 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 7 and Mazda CX-5?

The Chery Tiggo 7 is the cheapest at $27,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-5 by $12,490.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Tiggo 7 uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 7 and Mazda CX-5 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 7 has the largest boot at 475L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Tiggo 7 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-5 makes the most power at 140kW. The Mazda CX-5 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.7s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs