CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs Honda ZR-V
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs Honda ZR-V

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryHonda
Price (RRP)$38,990$38,900
Power180kW131kW
0-100 km/h8.5s8s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km5.8 L/100km
Boot Space550L339L
Towing2,000kg1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max starts from $38,990 before on-road costs, while the Honda ZR-V opens at $38,900. That makes the Honda ZR-V the more affordable entry point by $90.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $42,889 and $42,790 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Honda ZR-V by roughly $3,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and Honda ZR-V hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 79% for the Honda ZR-V.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Honda ZR-V packs more ADAS features with 8 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 10 in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 7 in the Honda ZR-V.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Honda ZR-V gets a 9-inch display and 10.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max stands out with Sony audio that you will not find on the Honda ZR-V. The Honda ZR-V counters with ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max uses a Petrol producing 180kW and 375Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Honda ZR-V responds with a Petrol making 131kW and 187Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 131kW. In the real-world sprint, the Honda ZR-V is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max measures 4,720mm long on a 2,710mm wheelbase, 152mm longer than the Honda ZR-V at 4,568mm (2,655mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 550L in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 339L in the Honda ZR-V, giving the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max a 211L advantage. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.8m

Honda ZR-V VTi X
10.4mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max Urban FWD
11.8m
Worst
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Honda ZR-V
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and $1,653/year for the Honda ZR-V. That is a $656 annual difference in favour of the Honda ZR-V.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs $1,653 (Honda ZR-V). The Honda ZR-V saves you roughly $656 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Honda ZR-V). The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —5yr (Honda ZR-V).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Honda ZR-V if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Honda ZR-V will save you roughly $656 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and Honda ZR-V?

The Honda ZR-V is the cheapest at $38,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max by $90.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Honda ZR-V uses the least fuel at 5.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and Honda ZR-V all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the largest boot at 550L.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max makes the most power at 180kW. The Honda ZR-V is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs