CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid vs GWM Tank 300
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid vs GWM Tank 300

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryGWM
Price (RRP)$49,550$49,990
Range (WLTP)90km
Battery19 kWh
Electric range90km
Power225kW167kW
0-100 km/h9.5s
Max DC Charge41kW
Fuel Economy1.3 kWh/100km9.5 L/100km
Boot Space143L550L
Towing1,500kg2,000kg
Warranty7yr / unlimited7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid starts from $49,550 before on-road costs, while the GWM Tank 300 opens at $49,990. That makes the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $440.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $54,505 and $54,989 respectively.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The GWM Tank 300, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid by roughly $13,230 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid features a 15.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the GWM Tank 300 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid stands out with wireless charging, heated front seats, Sony audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the GWM Tank 300. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid uses a 1.5L Turbocharged Petrol producing 225kW and 215Nm of torque, sent through a dedicated hybrid transmission (3dht) to a FWD layout.

The GWM Tank 300 responds with a Petrol making 167kW and 387Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 225kW vs 167kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid measures 4,800mm long on a 2,750mm wheelbase, 85mm longer than the GWM Tank 300 at 4,715mm (2,750mm wheelbase).

Boot space is 143L in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid and 550L in the GWM Tank 300, giving the GWM Tank 300 a 407L advantage. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the GWM Tank 300 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.0m diameter

Average

GWM Tank 300 Lux
12.0m
GWM Tank 300
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $62/year for the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid and $2,708/year for the GWM Tank 300. That is a $2,646 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $62 (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid) vs $2,708 (GWM Tank 300). The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid saves you roughly $2,646 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 300). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Tank 300 if: You need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $2,646 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Tank 300 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid and GWM Tank 300?

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid is the cheapest at $49,550 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Tank 300 by $440.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid uses the least fuel at 1.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GWM Tank 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Tank 300 has the largest boot at 550L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Tank 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid makes the most power at 225kW.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs