CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Everest vs Audi Q3 Sportback
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Everest vs Audi Q3 Sportback

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordAudi
Price (RRP)$68,990$64,600
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power184kW110kW
0-100 km/h9.1s
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km5.8 L/100km
Boot Space259L488L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Ford Everest & Audi Q3 Sportback

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ford Everest starts from $68,990 before on-road costs, while the Audi Q3 Sportback opens at $64,600. That makes the Audi Q3 Sportback the more affordable entry point by $4,390.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $75,889 and $71,060 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi Q3 Sportback by roughly $3,850 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Ford Everest and Audi Q3 Sportback hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Ford Everest and 87% for the Audi Q3 Sportback.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Ford Everest, against 6 on the Audi Q3 Sportback.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Ford Everest and 6 in the Audi Q3 Sportback.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Everest features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Audi Q3 Sportback gets a 10.1-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Everest stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats and ventilated seats that you will not find on the Audi Q3 Sportback. The Audi Q3 Sportback counters with Apple CarPlay, head-up display, Bang & Olufsen audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Everest uses a Diesel V6 Turbo producing 184kW and 600Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout.

The Audi Q3 Sportback responds with a 4-cylinder inline petrol with turbocharging, MHEV technology and Cylinder on Demand (CoD) making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a 7-speed s tronic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Everest measures 4,978mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 447mm longer than the Audi Q3 Sportback at 4,531mm (2,681mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 259L in the Ford Everest and 488L in the Audi Q3 Sportback, giving the Audi Q3 Sportback a 229L advantage. The Ford Everest seats 7 vs 5.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.7m to 11.8m

TightestAudi Q3 Sportback TFSI 110 kW SportbackTightest turn at 11.7m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Audi Q3 Sportback TFSI 110 kW Sportback
11.7mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m
Worst
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Audi Q3 Sportback TFSI 110 kW Sportback
11.7m · Average

Based on 11.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestAudi Q3 SportbackTightest turn at 11.7m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford Everest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Audi Q3 SportbackTightest11.7 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Ford Everest and $1,653/year for the Audi Q3 Sportback. That is a $770 annual difference in favour of the Audi Q3 Sportback.

Estimated annual total: $2,423 (Ford Everest) vs $1,653 (Audi Q3 Sportback). The Audi Q3 Sportback saves you roughly $770 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Audi Q3 Sportback). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Audi Q3 Sportback if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Audi Q3 Sportback takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Audi Q3 Sportback will save you roughly $770 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Audi Q3 Sportback has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Everest and Audi Q3 Sportback?

The Audi Q3 Sportback is the cheapest at $64,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Everest by $4,390.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi Q3 Sportback uses the least fuel at 5.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Ford Everest and Audi Q3 Sportback all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Audi Q3 Sportback has the largest boot at 488L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Everest makes the most power at 184kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best hybrid cars