CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Ford Everest vs Honda Prelude
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Everest vs Honda Prelude

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordHonda
Price (RRP)$68,990$61,100
Fuel typeDieselHybrid
Power184kW135kW
0-100 km/h—8.2s
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km4.3 L/100km
Boot Space259L264L
Towing3,500kg—
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Ford Everest & Honda Prelude

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ford Everest starts from $68,990 before on-road costs, while the Honda Prelude opens at $61,100. That makes the Honda Prelude the more affordable entry point by $7,890.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $75,889 and $67,210 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Honda Prelude by roughly $5,985 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Everest features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Honda Prelude gets a 9-inch display and 10.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Everest stands out with heated front seats, ventilated seats and power tailgate — features our data doesn't list for the Honda Prelude. The Honda Prelude counters with Bose audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Everest uses a Diesel V6 Turbo producing 184kW and 600Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout.

The Honda Prelude responds with a Inline 4 making 135kW and 315Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.2 seconds.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 135kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Everest measures 4,978mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 285mm longer than the Honda Prelude at 4,693mm (2,735mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 259L in the Ford Everest and 264L in the Honda Prelude, giving the Honda Prelude a 5L advantage. The Ford Everest seats 7 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 11.8m

TightestFord Everest SportTightest turn at 11.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Ford Everest Sport
11.8mTighter
Best
Honda Prelude e:HEV
11.8m
Best
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Honda Prelude e:HEV
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestFord EverestTightest turn at 11.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford EverestTightest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Honda Prelude11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Ford Everest and $1,226/year for the Honda Prelude. That is a $1,197 annual difference in favour of the Honda Prelude.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Honda Prelude). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Honda Prelude if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Honda Prelude takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Honda Prelude will save you roughly $1,197 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Everest and Honda Prelude?

The Honda Prelude is the cheapest at $61,100 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Everest by $7,890.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Honda Prelude uses the least fuel at 4.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Ford Everest holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Honda Prelude, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Honda Prelude has the largest boot at 264L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Everest makes the most power at 184kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · All Coupes · Best mid-size SUVs · Best hybrid cars