CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Everest vs Skoda Enyaq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Everest vs Skoda Enyaq

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordSkoda
Price (RRP)$59,490$59,990
Range (WLTP)575km
Battery82 kWh
Power154kW210kW
0-100 km/h10.1s5.4s
Max DC Charge175kW
10-80% Charge Time21 min
Fuel Economy7.2 L/100km
Boot Space259L585L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Ford Everest starts from $59,490 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Enyaq opens at $59,990. That makes the Ford Everest the more affordable entry point by $500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,439 and $65,989 respectively.

The Skoda Enyaq qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Ford Everest, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Ford Everest and Skoda Enyaq hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Ford Everest and 94% for the Skoda Enyaq.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Ford Everest packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Skoda Enyaq.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. The Skoda Enyaq adds a 360-degree camera that the Ford Everest misses.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Everest features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Enyaq gets a 13-inch display and 5.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Skoda Enyaq counters with head-up display, heated front seats, ventilated seats and power tailgate that the Ford Everest does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Ford Everest gets cloth upholstery while the Skoda Enyaq offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Ford Everest and 3-zone in the Skoda Enyaq.

Drivetrain

The Ford Everest uses a Diesel Bi-Turbo producing 154kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.1 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq responds with a Electric Motor making 210kW and 545Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.4 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq has the clear power advantage at 210kW vs 154kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Enyaq is 4.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Everest measures 4,978mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 319mm longer than the Skoda Enyaq at 4,659mm (2,766mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 259L in the Ford Everest and 585L in the Skoda Enyaq, giving the Skoda Enyaq a 326L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 11.8m

Skoda Enyaq 85 Sportline
9.3mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Ambiente
11.8m
Worst
Ford Everest
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Enyaq
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Enyaq). The Skoda Enyaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Everest if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Enyaq if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Enyaq takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Skoda Enyaq has a clear edge. The Skoda Enyaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Everest and Skoda Enyaq?

The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $59,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Enyaq by $500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford Everest uses the least fuel at 7.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Ford Everest and Skoda Enyaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Enyaq has the largest boot at 585L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Enyaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Skoda Enyaq makes the most power at 210kW. The Skoda Enyaq is quickest to 100km/h in 5.4s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs