CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Ranger vs Hyundai i30 Fastback N
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Ranger vs Hyundai i30 Fastback N

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Hyundai i30 Fastback N: we're still completing price, kerb weight, seat count, 0-100km/h and warranty, plus 1 other.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFordHyundai
Price (RRP)$37,130TBC
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power125kW206kW
0-100 km/h10.5s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km8.5 L/100km
Boot Space436L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Ford Ranger & Hyundai i30 Fastback N

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Ranger features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Hyundai i30 Fastback N gets a 10.3-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Ranger stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Hyundai i30 Fastback N. The Hyundai i30 Fastback N counters with Apple CarPlay, wireless charging and heated front seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Ford Ranger gets cloth upholstery while the Hyundai i30 Fastback N offers alcantara / leather appointed n light seats.

Drivetrain

The Ford Ranger uses a Diesel Turbo producing 125kW and 405Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Hyundai i30 Fastback N responds with a 2.0 T-GDi (Theta-II) making 206kW and 392Nm, paired to a 8-speed n dct (wet clutch) with sequential manual mode driving the front wheels.

The Hyundai i30 Fastback N has the clear power advantage at 206kW vs 125kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Ranger measures 5,225mm long on a 3,270mm wheelbase, 770mm longer than the Hyundai i30 Fastback N at 4,455mm (2,650mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Ranger generally means more rear legroom.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 12.9m

TightestHyundai i30 Fastback N N Limited Edition 2.0 T-GDi N DCTTightest turn at 11.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Hyundai i30 Fastback N N Limited Edition 2.0 T-GDi N DCT
11.6mTighter
Best
Ford Ranger XL 4x2 Hi-Rider Single Cab Cab-Chassis
12.9m
Worst
Ford Ranger XL 4x2 Hi-Rider Single Cab Cab-Chassis
12.9m · Large

Based on 12.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Hyundai i30 Fastback N N Limited Edition 2.0 T-GDi N DCT
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestHyundai i30 Fastback NTightest turn at 11.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford Ranger12.9 m
Large△ 3-point
Hyundai i30 Fastback NTightest11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Ford Ranger and $2,423/year for the Hyundai i30 Fastback N. That is a $456 annual difference in favour of the Ford Ranger.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Ranger if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Hyundai i30 Fastback N if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Ford Ranger and Hyundai i30 Fastback N trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Ford Ranger will save you roughly $456 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Ranger and Hyundai i30 Fastback N?

The Ford Ranger is the cheapest at $37,130 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford Ranger uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Ford Ranger holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Hyundai i30 Fastback N, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Ranger has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Hyundai i30 Fastback N makes the most power at 206kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · All Fastbacks · Best utes in Australia · Best family cars