Ford Ranger vs Mitsubishi Mirage
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Ford Ranger & Mitsubishi Mirage
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
Both the Ford Ranger and Mitsubishi Mirage hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Ford Ranger packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Mitsubishi Mirage.
Both include the essentials: core safety systems.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Ford Ranger stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Mirage. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Ford Ranger uses a Diesel Turbo producing 125kW and 405Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Mitsubishi Mirage lines up making 57kW and 100Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels.
The Ford Ranger has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 57kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford Ranger measures 5,225mm long on a 3,270mm wheelbase, 1515mm longer than the Mitsubishi Mirage at 3,710mm (2,450mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Ranger generally means more rear legroom.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
4.6m to 12.9m
Based on 12.9m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 4.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars1 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Ford Ranger and $1,311/year for the Mitsubishi Mirage. That is a $656 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Mirage.
Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Ford Ranger) vs $1,311 (Mitsubishi Mirage). The Mitsubishi Mirage saves you roughly $656 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Ranger) vs 5 years / 100,000km (Mitsubishi Mirage). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Ranger if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mitsubishi Mirage if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mitsubishi Mirage takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Mitsubishi Mirage will save you roughly $656 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Ranger and Mitsubishi Mirage?
The Ford Ranger is the cheapest at $37,130 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi Mirage uses the least fuel at 4.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Ford Ranger and Mitsubishi Mirage all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mitsubishi Mirage has the largest boot at 235L.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Ranger has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Ranger makes the most power at 125kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
