Foton Tunland vs BYD Shark 6
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 4 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the Foton Tunland & BYD Shark 6
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Foton Tunland starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the BYD Shark 6 opens at $53,900. That makes the Foton Tunland the more affordable entry point by $13,910.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $59,290 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BYD Shark 6 by roughly $9,650 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Foton Tunland
None open on our record
BYD Shark 6
- REC-006728 · published 21 Sep 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, the spare wheel tray or lifter may have been incorrectly positioned.Year range on the notice: 2024 - 2026
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
29.6kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 55kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 55kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Foton Tunland features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the BYD Shark 6 gets a 15.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Foton Tunland stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the BYD Shark 6. The BYD Shark 6 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate, V2L and Dynaudio audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Foton Tunland gets leatherette upholstery while the BYD Shark 6 offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The Foton Tunland uses a Turbo-diesel mild hybrid producing 120kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.
The BYD Shark 6 responds with a Plug-in Hybrid making 321kW and 650Nm, paired to a auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.7 seconds.
The BYD Shark 6 has the clear power advantage at 321kW vs 120kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the BYD Shark 6 is 5.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Foton Tunland measures 5,617mm long on a 3,355mm wheelbase, 160mm longer than the BYD Shark 6 at 5,457mm (3,260mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Foton Tunland generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Foton Tunland leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
13.5m to 13.5m
Based on 13.5m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 13.5m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Foton Tunland and $379/year for the BYD Shark 6. That is a $1,930 annual difference in favour of the BYD Shark 6.
Warranty: 7 years (Foton Tunland) vs 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Shark 6). The Foton Tunland has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Foton Tunland)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Foton Tunland if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Foton's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the BYD Shark 6 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
BYD Shark 6: Top CarSorted Score, 74 vs 62, but the Foton Tunland is $13,910 cheaper
The BYD Shark 6 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (74 vs 62), taking 4 of 7 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: technology (BYD Shark 6 ahead by 50), performance (BYD Shark 6 ahead by 42), safety (BYD Shark 6 ahead by 33). The BYD Shark 6 will save you roughly $1,930 a year in fuel. The Foton Tunland adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Foton Tunland and BYD Shark 6?
The Foton Tunland is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BYD Shark 6 by $13,910.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The BYD Shark 6 uses the least fuel at 2L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
BYD Shark 6 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Foton Tunland, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The Foton Tunland has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Foton Tunland has the longest warranty at 7 years / No data.
Which is the most powerful?
The BYD Shark 6 makes the most power at 321kW. The BYD Shark 6 is quickest to 100km/h in 5.7s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
