CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGAC Aion UT vs Mitsubishi i-MiEV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GAC Aion UT vs Mitsubishi i-MiEV

Two electric Hatchbacks go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Mitsubishi i-MiEV: we're still completing price, kerb weight, 0-100km/h, warranty and ground clearance, plus 2 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecGACMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$31,990TBC
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)430km160km
Battery60 kWh16 kWh
Power150kW47kW
0-100 km/h7.3s
Max DC Charge87kW50kW
10-80% Charge Time24 min30 min
Boot Space321L
Warranty8yr / 150k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data
V2LYesNo

Track the GAC Aion UT & Mitsubishi i-MiEV

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

44kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

42 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 87kW · 0–80%

30 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (6.6kW AC, 87kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

16kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

15 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 50kW · 0–80%

19 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 50kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The GAC Aion UT stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and V2L — features our data doesn't list for the Mitsubishi i-MiEV. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The GAC Aion UT uses a Electric producing 150kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.3 seconds.

The Mitsubishi i-MiEV responds with a Electric making 47kW and 180Nm, paired to a single-speed fixed gear driving the rear wheels.

The GAC Aion UT has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 47kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 60kWh (GAC Aion UT) vs 16kWh (Mitsubishi i-MiEV), giving WLTP ranges of 430km and 160km. DC fast charging peaks at 87kW (GAC Aion UT) vs 50kW (Mitsubishi i-MiEV).

Space & Comfort

The GAC Aion UT measures 4,270mm long on a 2,750mm wheelbase, 875mm longer than the Mitsubishi i-MiEV at 3,395mm (2,550mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC Aion UT generally means more rear legroom.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.0m to 11.2m

TightestMitsubishi i-MiEV i-MiEVTightest turn at 9.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi i-MiEV i-MiEV
9.0mTighter
Best
GAC Aion UT Premium
11.2m
Worst
GAC Aion UT Premium
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi i-MiEV
9.0m · Excellent

Based on 9.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi i-MiEVTightest turn at 9.0m, needs the least road to swing around
GAC Aion UT11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Mitsubishi i-MiEVTightest9.0 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GAC Aion UT if: You prioritise performance, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi i-MiEV if: You or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GAC Aion UT takes 6 of 6 key spec categories. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GAC Aion UT and Mitsubishi i-MiEV?

The GAC Aion UT is the cheapest at $31,990 before on-road costs.

Which has the longest driving range?

The GAC Aion UT has the most range at 430km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The GAC Aion UT accepts the highest DC charging at up to 87kW.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of GAC Aion UT and Mitsubishi i-MiEV carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC Aion UT makes the most power at 150kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best electric cars