GWM Tank 300 vs Zeekr X
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 8 Sep 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$49,990RRP
- no option data for this car
$49,900RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the GWM Tank 300 & Zeekr X
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The GWM Tank 300 starts from $49,990 before on-road costs, while the Zeekr X opens at $49,900. That makes the Zeekr X the more affordable entry point by $90.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $54,989 and $54,890 respectively.
The Zeekr X currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The GWM Tank 300 does not: only battery-electric vehicles qualify.
Safety Rundown
Both the GWM Tank 300 and Zeekr X hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the GWM Tank 300 and 91% for the Zeekr X.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 9 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Zeekr X, against 6 on the GWM Tank 300.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GWM Tank 300 and 7 in the Zeekr X.
Recalls on our record
GWM Tank 300
- REC-006516 · published 24 Dec 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the shielding ring in the high voltage wiring harness may not be properly grounded.Year range on the notice: 2025
- REC-006024 · published 22 Jul 2024The adjusting rod used to operate the vehicle jack is of incorrect specification and may not function as intended.Year range on the notice: 2023
Zeekr X
None open on our record
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
66kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 230kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 230kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The GWM Tank 300 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Zeekr X gets a 14.6-inch display and 8.8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GWM Tank 300 stands out with power tailgate — features our data doesn't list for the Zeekr X. The Zeekr X counters with wireless charging, V2L, Yamaha audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the GWM Tank 300 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Zeekr X offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The GWM Tank 300 uses a Petrol producing 162kW and 380Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.5 seconds.
The Zeekr X responds with a Electric making 200kW, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.6 seconds.
The Zeekr X has the clear power advantage at 200kW vs 162kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Zeekr X is 3.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The GWM Tank 300 measures 4,715mm long on a 2,750mm wheelbase, 283mm longer than the Zeekr X at 4,432mm (2,750mm wheelbase).
Boot space is 550L in the GWM Tank 300 and 404L in the Zeekr X, giving the GWM Tank 300 a 146L advantage.
For towing, the GWM Tank 300 leads with a 3,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 12.0m
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 300) vs 5 years / 200,000km (Zeekr X). The GWM Tank 300 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the GWM Tank 300 if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Zeekr X if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Zeekr's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Zeekr X: Top CarSorted Score, 77 vs 74
The Zeekr X comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (77 vs 74), taking 4 of 7 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Zeekr X ahead by 33), practicality (GWM Tank 300 ahead by 23), performance (Zeekr X ahead by 14). If boot space matters, the GWM Tank 300 has a clear edge. The GWM Tank 300 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, GWM Tank 300 and Zeekr X?
The Zeekr X is the cheapest at $49,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Tank 300 by $90.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The GWM Tank 300 uses the least fuel at 9.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched on crash rating: GWM Tank 300 and Zeekr X all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The GWM Tank 300 has the largest boot at 550L with the seats up.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Tank 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Tank 300 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Zeekr X makes the most power at 200kW. The Zeekr X is quickest to 100km/h in 5.6s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
