GWM Tank 500 vs Skoda Enyaq
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The GWM Tank 500 starts from $59,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Enyaq opens at $59,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,989 and $65,989 respectively.
The Skoda Enyaq qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The GWM Tank 500, as a petrol model, does not qualify.
Safety Rundown
Both the GWM Tank 500 and Skoda Enyaq hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the GWM Tank 500 and 94% for the Skoda Enyaq.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. The Skoda Enyaq adds a 360-degree camera that the GWM Tank 500 misses.
Feature Showdown
The GWM Tank 500 features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Enyaq gets a 13-inch display and 5.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GWM Tank 500 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The GWM Tank 500 uses a Hybrid producing 255kW and 648Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed auto to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.
The Skoda Enyaq responds with a Electric Motor making 210kW and 545Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.4 seconds.
The GWM Tank 500 has the clear power advantage at 255kW vs 210kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Enyaq is 3.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The GWM Tank 500 measures 5,078mm long on a 2,850mm wheelbase, 419mm longer than the Skoda Enyaq at 4,659mm (2,766mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Tank 500 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 98L in the GWM Tank 500 and 585L in the Skoda Enyaq, giving the Skoda Enyaq a 487L advantage. The GWM Tank 500 seats 7 vs 5.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.3m to 11.2m
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 9.3m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 500) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Enyaq). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the GWM Tank 500 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Skoda Enyaq if: You need more boot space, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Skoda Enyaq takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Skoda Enyaq has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, GWM Tank 500 and Skoda Enyaq?
The GWM Tank 500 is the cheapest at $59,990 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The GWM Tank 500 uses the least fuel at 8.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — GWM Tank 500 and Skoda Enyaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Enyaq has the largest boot at 585L.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Tank 500 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,000kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The GWM Tank 500 makes the most power at 255kW. The Skoda Enyaq is quickest to 100km/h in 5.4s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
