CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHolden Trax vs Ford Everest
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Holden Trax vs Ford Everest

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHoldenFord
Price (RRP)TBC$59,490
Fuel typepetrolDiesel
Power103kW154kW
0-100 km/h10.1s
Fuel Economy6.7 L/100km7.2 L/100km
Boot Space387L259L
Towing1,200kg3,500kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Holden Trax & Ford Everest

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Holden Trax and Ford Everest hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Ford Everest packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Holden Trax.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Holden Trax stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Ford Everest. The Ford Everest counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Holden Trax lines up producing 103kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel Bi-Turbo making 154kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.1 seconds.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 154kW vs 103kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Holden Trax measures 4,264mm long on a 2,555mm wheelbase, 714mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 387L in the Holden Trax and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Holden Trax a 128L advantage.

For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 2,300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

5.7m to 11.8m

TightestHolden Trax LTZ 1.4TTightest turn at 5.7m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Holden Trax LTZ 1.4T
5.7mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Ambiente
11.8m
Worst
Holden Trax LTZ 1.4T
5.7m · Excellent

Based on 5.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Everest Ambiente
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestHolden TraxTightest turn at 5.7m, needs the least road to swing around
Holden TraxTightest5.7 m
Excellent✓ Clears
Ford Everest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

1 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the Holden Trax and $2,052/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Holden Trax.

Estimated annual total: $1,910 (Holden Trax) vs $2,052 (Ford Everest). The Holden Trax saves you roughly $142 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Holden Trax) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). The Ford Everest has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Holden Trax if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Holden's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Everest takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Holden Trax will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Holden Trax has a clear edge. The Ford Everest adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Holden Trax and Ford Everest?

The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $59,490 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Holden Trax uses the least fuel at 6.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Holden Trax and Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Holden Trax has the largest boot at 387L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Ford Everest has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Everest makes the most power at 154kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs