CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHolden Trax vs Toyota LandCruiser 300
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Holden Trax vs Toyota LandCruiser 300

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHoldenToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$97,990
Fuel typepetrolDiesel
Power103kW227kW
0-100 km/h8.6s
Fuel Economy6.7 L/100km8.9 L/100km
Boot Space387L700L
Towing1,200kg3,500kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Holden Trax & Toyota LandCruiser 300

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Holden Trax and Toyota LandCruiser 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota LandCruiser 300 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Holden Trax.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Holden Trax stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 300. The Toyota LandCruiser 300 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Holden Trax lines up producing 103kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 responds with a Diesel Twin-Turbo V6 making 227kW and 700Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the clear power advantage at 227kW vs 103kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Holden Trax measures 4,264mm long on a 2,555mm wheelbase, 716mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 300 at 4,980mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota LandCruiser 300 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 387L in the Holden Trax and 700L in the Toyota LandCruiser 300, giving the Toyota LandCruiser 300 a 313L advantage.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 2,300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

5.7m to 11.8m

TightestHolden Trax LTZ 1.4TTightest turn at 5.7m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Holden Trax LTZ 1.4T
5.7mTighter
Best
Toyota LandCruiser 300 GX
11.8m
Worst
Holden Trax LTZ 1.4T
5.7m · Excellent

Based on 5.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota LandCruiser 300 GX
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestHolden TraxTightest turn at 5.7m, needs the least road to swing around
Holden TraxTightest5.7 m
Excellent✓ Clears
Toyota LandCruiser 30011.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

1 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the Holden Trax and $2,537/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 300. That is a $627 annual difference in favour of the Holden Trax.

Estimated annual total: $1,910 (Holden Trax) vs $2,537 (Toyota LandCruiser 300). The Holden Trax saves you roughly $627 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Holden Trax) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 300). The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Holden Trax if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Holden's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 300 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The Holden Trax will save you roughly $627 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 has a clear edge. The Toyota LandCruiser 300 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Holden Trax and Toyota LandCruiser 300?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 is the cheapest at $97,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Holden Trax uses the least fuel at 6.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Holden Trax and Toyota LandCruiser 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the largest boot at 700L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 makes the most power at 227kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs