Hyundai Tucson vs Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Hyundai Tucson
From $38,900
SUV
Petrol
115kW
6.5 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
539L
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid
From $34,990
SUV
Petrol I4 Turbo + PHEV
105kW
1.4 kWh/100km
5★ ANCAP
475L
Price Breakdown
The Hyundai Tucson starts from $38,900 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid opens at $34,990. That makes the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $3,910.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $42,790 and $38,489 respectively.
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Hyundai Tucson, as a petrol model, does not qualify.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid by roughly $8,930 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Hyundai Tucson and Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Hyundai Tucson and 82% for the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Hyundai Tucson.
Both include the essentials: a reversing camera.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Hyundai Tucson stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Hyundai Tucson uses a Petrol producing 115kW and 192Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.2 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid responds with a Petrol I4 Turbo + PHEV making 105kW and 215Nm, paired to a 1-speed dedicated hybrid transmission (dht) driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.
The Hyundai Tucson has the clear power advantage at 115kW vs 105kW. In the real-world sprint, the Hyundai Tucson is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Hyundai Tucson measures 4,630mm long on a 2,755mm wheelbase, 95mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid at 4,535mm (2,653mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai Tucson generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 539L in the Hyundai Tucson and 475L in the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid, giving the Hyundai Tucson a 64L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m diameter
Average
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,853/year for the Hyundai Tucson and $67/year for the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid. That is a $1,786 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.
Estimated annual total: $1,853 (Hyundai Tucson) vs $67 (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid saves you roughly $1,786 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Tucson) vs 7 years (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Hyundai Tucson if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Hyundai Tucson takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $1,786 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Hyundai Tucson has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Hyundai Tucson and Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid?
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid is the cheapest at $34,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Hyundai Tucson by $3,910.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid uses the least fuel at 1.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Hyundai Tucson and Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Hyundai Tucson has the largest boot at 539L.
Which can tow the most?
The Hyundai Tucson has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,650kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has the longest warranty at 7 years.
Which is the most powerful?
The Hyundai Tucson makes the most power at 115kW. The Hyundai Tucson is quickest to 100km/h in 9.2s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
