CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIneos Quartermaster vs Mitsubishi Triton
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ineos Quartermaster vs Mitsubishi Triton

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecIneosMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$105,000$43,690
Power183kW150kW
0-100 km/h9.6s11.3s
Fuel Economy10.5 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space390L
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / unlimited10yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Ineos Quartermaster starts from $105,000 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Triton opens at $43,690. That makes the Mitsubishi Triton the more affordable entry point by $61,310.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $115,500 and $48,059 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Triton by roughly $4,420 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ineos Quartermaster features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi Triton gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ineos Quartermaster stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats and JBL audio that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Triton. The Mitsubishi Triton counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ineos Quartermaster uses a Twin-turbo diesel producing 183kW and 550Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.6 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Triton responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 470Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.3 seconds.

The Ineos Quartermaster has the clear power advantage at 183kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the Ineos Quartermaster is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ineos Quartermaster measures 5,395mm long on a 3,227mm wheelbase, 75mm longer than the Mitsubishi Triton at 5,320mm (3,130mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ineos Quartermaster generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the Mitsubishi Triton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 12.4m

Ineos Quartermaster Diesel
11.8mTighter
Best
Mitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2
12.4m
Worst
Ineos Quartermaster
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Triton
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,993/year for the Ineos Quartermaster and $2,109/year for the Mitsubishi Triton. That is a $884 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Triton.

Estimated annual total: $2,993 (Ineos Quartermaster) vs $2,109 (Mitsubishi Triton). The Mitsubishi Triton saves you roughly $884 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years (Ineos Quartermaster) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 5yr (Ineos Quartermaster)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ineos Quartermaster if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Ineos's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Ineos Quartermaster and Mitsubishi Triton trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mitsubishi Triton will save you roughly $884 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ineos Quartermaster and Mitsubishi Triton?

The Mitsubishi Triton is the cheapest at $43,690 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ineos Quartermaster by $61,310.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Triton uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Triton all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Ineos Quartermaster has the largest boot at 390L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ineos Quartermaster has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ineos Quartermaster makes the most power at 183kW. The Ineos Quartermaster is quickest to 100km/h in 9.6s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes