JAC Hunter PHEV vs BYD Shark 6
Two electric Utes go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
JAC Hunter PHEV
Price TBC
Ute
Plug-in Hybrid
2.0TGDI Turbo Petrol Direct Injection
360kW
1.6 kWh/100km
5★ ANCAP
—
BYD Shark 6
From $55,900
Ute
Plug-in Hybrid
Hybrid
321kW
2 kWh/100km
5★ ANCAP
—
JAC Hunter PHEV: we're still completing price, torque, 0-100km/h, turning circle and energy consumption.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the JAC Hunter PHEV & BYD Shark 6
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
Both the JAC Hunter PHEV and BYD Shark 6 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the JAC Hunter PHEV and 85% for the BYD Shark 6.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 7 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
31.2kWh usableEstimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
How long to charge
29.6kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 55kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 55kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The JAC Hunter PHEV features a 10.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the BYD Shark 6 gets a 12.8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The JAC Hunter PHEV stands out with heated front seats and ambient lighting that you will not find on the BYD Shark 6. The BYD Shark 6 counters with V2L and Dynaudio audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The JAC Hunter PHEV uses a 2.0TGDI Turbo Petrol Direct Injection producing 360kW, sent through a 4dht to a 4WD layout.
The BYD Shark 6 responds with a Hybrid making 321kW and 650Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.
The JAC Hunter PHEV has the clear power advantage at 360kW vs 321kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 31.2kWh (JAC Hunter PHEV) vs 29.6kWh (BYD Shark 6), giving WLTP ranges of 100km and 100km.
Space & Comfort
The JAC Hunter PHEV measures 5,330mm long on a 3,110mm wheelbase, 83mm shorter than the BYD Shark 6 at 5,413mm (3,260mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD Shark 6 generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the JAC Hunter PHEV leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
13.5m diameter
Large
Based on 13.5m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Large
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 11.9 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: 3-point turn
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
2.0 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: careful, tight swing
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, electricity costs roughly $77/year for the JAC Hunter PHEV and $379/year for the BYD Shark 6. That is a $302 annual difference in favour of the JAC Hunter PHEV.
Estimated annual total: $77 (JAC Hunter PHEV) vs $379 (BYD Shark 6). The JAC Hunter PHEV saves you roughly $302 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (JAC Hunter PHEV) vs 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Shark 6). The JAC Hunter PHEV has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (JAC Hunter PHEV)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the JAC Hunter PHEV if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer JAC's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the BYD Shark 6 if: You or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The JAC Hunter PHEV takes 5 of 6 key spec categories. The JAC Hunter PHEV will save you roughly $302 a year in electricity. The JAC Hunter PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, JAC Hunter PHEV and BYD Shark 6?
The BYD Shark 6 is the cheapest at $55,900 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The JAC Hunter PHEV uses the least fuel at 1.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — JAC Hunter PHEV and BYD Shark 6 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The JAC Hunter PHEV has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The JAC Hunter PHEV has the longest warranty at 7 years / 150k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The JAC Hunter PHEV makes the most power at 360kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
