CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsJAC T9 vs KGM Musso EV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

JAC T9 vs KGM Musso EV

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecJACKGM
Price (RRP)$42,662$60,000
Fuel typeDieselElectric
Range (WLTP)420km
Battery80.6 kWh
Power125kW152kW
0-100 km/h11.5s10.9s
Max DC Charge300kW
10-80% Charge Time36 min
Fuel Economy7.6 L/100km
Boot Space532L
Towing3,200kg1,800kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data
V2LNoYes

Track the JAC T9 & KGM Musso EV

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The JAC T9 starts from $42,662 before on-road costs, while the KGM Musso EV opens at $60,000. That makes the JAC T9 the more affordable entry point by $17,338.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $46,928 and $66,000 respectively.

The KGM Musso EV qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The JAC T9, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

80.6kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 17m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 300kW · 0–80%

16 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 300kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The JAC T9 features a 10.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the KGM Musso EV gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The JAC T9 stands out with wireless charging that you will not find on the KGM Musso EV. The KGM Musso EV counters with heated front seats, ventilated seats and V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The JAC T9 uses a Turbo-diesel producing 125kW and 410Nm of torque, sent through a 8at to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.

The KGM Musso EV responds with a Electric making 152kW and 339Nm, paired to a 1-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The KGM Musso EV has the clear power advantage at 152kW vs 125kW. In the real-world sprint, the KGM Musso EV is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The JAC T9 measures 5,330mm long on a 3,110mm wheelbase, 170mm longer than the KGM Musso EV at 5,160mm (3,150mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Musso EV generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the JAC T9 leads with a 3,200kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m to 13.0m

TightestKGM Musso EV 2WDTightest turn at 12.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
KGM Musso EV 2WD
12.2mTighter
Best
JAC T9 Oasis 4x4
13.0m
Worst
JAC T9 Oasis 4x4
13.0m · Large

Based on 13.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
KGM Musso EV 2WD
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKGM Musso EVTightest turn at 12.2m, needs the least road to swing around
JAC T913.0 m
Large△ 3-point
KGM Musso EVTightest12.2 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years (JAC T9) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso EV). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (JAC T9)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the JAC T9 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer JAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Musso EV if: You prioritise performance, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The KGM Musso EV takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, JAC T9 and KGM Musso EV?

The JAC T9 is the cheapest at $42,662 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Musso EV by $17,338.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The JAC T9 uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — JAC T9 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The JAC T9 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Musso EV makes the most power at 152kW. The KGM Musso EV is quickest to 100km/h in 10.9s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia