CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›JAC T9 vs KGM Musso EV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

JAC T9 vs KGM Musso EV

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 6 Aug 2026, price 23 Oct 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
JAC T9Oasis 4x411?01
KGM Musso EVAWD9?03

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecJACKGM
Price (RRP)$42,662TBC
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$42,662RRP

  • no option data for this car

No price

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeDieselElectric
Range (WLTP)—380km
Battery—80.6 kWh
Power125kW266kW
0-100 km/h11.5s10.9s
Max DC Charge—300kW
10-80% Charge Time—46 min
Fuel Economy7.6 L/100km—
Boot (seats up)—532L
Towing3,200kg1,800kg
Warranty7yr / No data7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data
V2LNoYes

Track the JAC T9 & KGM Musso EV

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

JAC T9

  • REC-006377 · published 8 Jul 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the retaining bolts on the left and right-side curtain airbags may not have been fastened with sufficient torque.Year range on the notice: 2023 - 2024
  • REC-006211 · published 13 Dec 2024Due to the failure of the turbo actuator module, the vehicle may inadvertently activate limp-home mode resulting in a gradual reduction of motive power whilst driving.Year range on the notice: 2024

KGM Musso EV

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

80.6kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 17m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 300kW · 0–80%

16 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 300kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The JAC T9 features a 10.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the KGM Musso EV gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The JAC T9 stands out with wireless charging — features our data doesn't list for the KGM Musso EV. The KGM Musso EV counters with heated front seats, ventilated seats and V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The JAC T9 uses a Turbo-diesel producing 125kW and 410Nm of torque, sent through a 8at to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.

The KGM Musso EV responds with a Electric making 266kW and 630Nm, paired to a 1-speed driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The KGM Musso EV has the clear power advantage at 266kW vs 125kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the KGM Musso EV is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The JAC T9 measures 5,330mm long on a 3,110mm wheelbase, 170mm longer than the KGM Musso EV at 5,160mm (3,150mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Musso EV generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the JAC T9 leads with a 3,200kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m to 13.0m

TightestKGM Musso EV AWDTightest turn at 12.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
KGM Musso EV AWD
12.2mTighter
Best
JAC T9 Oasis 4x4
13.0m
Worst
JAC T9 Oasis 4x4
13.0m · Large

Based on 13.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
KGM Musso EV AWD
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKGM Musso EVTightest turn at 12.2m, needs the least road to swing around
JAC T913.0 m
Large△ 3-point
KGM Musso EVTightest12.2 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years (JAC T9) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso EV). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (JAC T9)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the JAC T9 if: You need stronger towing, or prefer JAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Musso EV if: You prioritise performance, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

JAC T9: Top CarSorted Score, 76 vs 67

The JAC T9 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (76 vs 67), taking 1 of 4 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (JAC T9 ahead by 22), performance (KGM Musso EV ahead by 22), safety (JAC T9 ahead by 21). The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, JAC T9 and KGM Musso EV?

The JAC T9 is the cheapest at $42,662 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The JAC T9 uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

JAC T9 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for KGM Musso EV, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The JAC T9 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Musso EV makes the most power at 266kW. The KGM Musso EV is quickest to 100km/h in 10.9s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia