CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsJeep Compass vs GWM Tank 300
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Jeep Compass vs GWM Tank 300

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecJeepGWM
Price (RRP)$50,500$49,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power96kW162kW
0-100 km/h10s9.5s
Fuel Economy5.1 L/100km9.5 L/100km
Boot Space438L550L
Towing1,450kg3,000kg
Warranty5yr / 100k km7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Jeep Compass & GWM Tank 300

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Jeep Compass starts from $50,500 before on-road costs, while the GWM Tank 300 opens at $49,990. That makes the GWM Tank 300 the more affordable entry point by $510.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $55,550 and $54,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Jeep Compass by roughly $6,270 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Jeep Compass features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the GWM Tank 300 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Jeep Compass stands out with wireless charging and heated front seats that you will not find on the GWM Tank 300. The GWM Tank 300 counters with panoramic roof and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Jeep Compass gets leather upholstery while the GWM Tank 300 offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Jeep Compass uses a Petrol I4 Mild Hybrid + 48V producing 96kW and 240Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dual clutch automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10 seconds.

The GWM Tank 300 responds with a Petrol making 162kW and 380Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The GWM Tank 300 has the clear power advantage at 162kW vs 96kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Tank 300 is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Jeep Compass measures 4,404mm long on a 2,636mm wheelbase, 311mm shorter than the GWM Tank 300 at 4,715mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Tank 300 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 438L in the Jeep Compass and 550L in the GWM Tank 300, giving the GWM Tank 300 a 112L advantage.

For towing, the GWM Tank 300 leads with a 3,000kg braked capacity vs 1,450kg. That 1,550kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 12.0m

Jeep Compass Limited e-Hybrid
11.1mTighter
Best
GWM Tank 300 Lux
12.0m
Worst
Jeep Compass Limited e-Hybrid
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Tank 300 Lux
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,454/year for the Jeep Compass and $2,708/year for the GWM Tank 300. That is a $1,254 annual difference in favour of the Jeep Compass.

Estimated annual total: $1,454 (Jeep Compass) vs $2,708 (GWM Tank 300). The Jeep Compass saves you roughly $1,254 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 100,000km (Jeep Compass) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 300). The GWM Tank 300 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Jeep Compass if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Jeep's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Tank 300 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Tank 300 takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Jeep Compass will save you roughly $1,254 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Tank 300 has a clear edge. The GWM Tank 300 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Jeep Compass and GWM Tank 300?

The GWM Tank 300 is the cheapest at $49,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Jeep Compass by $510.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Jeep Compass uses the least fuel at 5.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GWM Tank 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Tank 300 has the largest boot at 550L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Tank 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GWM Tank 300 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Tank 300 makes the most power at 162kW. The GWM Tank 300 is quickest to 100km/h in 9.5s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best mid-size SUVs