CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Musso vs Foton Tunland
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Musso vs Foton Tunland

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMFoton
Price (RRP)$40,500$39,990
Range (WLTP)330km
Battery88.6 kWh
Power133kW120kW
0-100 km/h10.9s11s
Max DC Charge80kW
10-80% Charge Time45 min
Fuel Economy8.6 L/100km8.1 L/100km
Boot Space532L
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km7yr / unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Price Breakdown

The KGM Musso starts from $40,500 before on-road costs, while the Foton Tunland opens at $39,990. That makes the Foton Tunland the more affordable entry point by $510.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $44,550 and $43,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Musso features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Foton Tunland gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Musso stands out with ambient lighting that you will not find on the Foton Tunland. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the KGM Musso gets leather upholstery while the Foton Tunland offers leatherette.

Drivetrain

The KGM Musso uses a Turbo DDi Diesel producing 133kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The Foton Tunland responds with a Turbo-diesel mild hybrid making 120kW and 450Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11 seconds.

The KGM Musso has the clear power advantage at 133kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the KGM Musso is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Musso measures 5,105mm long on a 3,000mm wheelbase, 260mm shorter than the Foton Tunland at 5,365mm (3,155mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Foton Tunland generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the Foton Tunland leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m to 12.6m

KGM Musso ELX
12.2mTighter
Best
Foton Tunland V7-C 4x2
12.6m
Worst
KGM Musso
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Foton Tunland
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,451/year for the KGM Musso and $2,309/year for the Foton Tunland. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Foton Tunland.

Estimated annual total: $2,451 (KGM Musso) vs $2,309 (Foton Tunland). The Foton Tunland saves you roughly $142 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso) vs 7 years (Foton Tunland). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (Foton Tunland).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Musso if: You prioritise performance, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Foton Tunland if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Foton's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The KGM Musso takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Foton Tunland will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Musso and Foton Tunland?

The Foton Tunland is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Musso by $510.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Foton Tunland uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — KGM Musso all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Musso has the largest boot at 532L.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Musso has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Musso makes the most power at 133kW. The KGM Musso is quickest to 100km/h in 10.9s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes