CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›KGM Torres vs Hyundai Kona
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Torres vs Hyundai Kona

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 7 Sep 2026, price 5 Oct 2026

SpecKGMHyundai
Price (RRP)$34,990$33,950
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power120kW110kW
0-100 km/h11.8s9.9s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km6.6 L/100km
Boot (seats up)455L361L
Towing1,500kg1,300kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data4 Stars

Track the KGM Torres & Hyundai Kona

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The KGM Torres starts from $34,990 before on-road costs, while the Hyundai Kona opens at $33,950. That makes the Hyundai Kona the more affordable entry point by $1,040.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $38,489 and $37,345 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Hyundai Kona by roughly $1,855 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

KGM Torres

None open on our record

Hyundai Kona

  • REC-006734 · published 28 Sep 2026Rear centre seat belt buckle anchor below specificationYear range on the notice: 2025 - 2026
  • REC-006589 · published 20 Apr 2026Due to a software issue, the Instrument Panel Cluster (IPC) may fail to illuminate the visual vehicle speed, fuel level and other critical safety information.Year range on the notice: 2025
  • REC-005978 · published 6 Jun 2024The Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) valve sensor may have been exposed to soldering flux contamination during manufacture.Year range on the notice: 2024
  • 2 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Torres features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Hyundai Kona gets a 12.3-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Torres stands out with ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Hyundai Kona. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the KGM Torres gets leather upholstery while the Hyundai Kona offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The KGM Torres uses a Turbo GDi producing 120kW and 280Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.8 seconds.

The Hyundai Kona responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 180Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.9 seconds.

The KGM Torres has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 110kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Hyundai Kona is 1.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Torres measures 4,700mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 350mm longer than the Hyundai Kona at 4,350mm (2,660mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Torres generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 455L in the KGM Torres and 361L in the Hyundai Kona, giving the KGM Torres a 94L advantage.

For towing, the KGM Torres leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.2m

TightestHyundai Kona 2.0 FWDTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6mTighter
Best
KGM Torres ELX
11.2m
Worst
KGM Torres ELX
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestHyundai KonaTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
KGM Torres11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Hyundai KonaTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the KGM Torres and $1,881/year for the Hyundai Kona. That is a $371 annual difference in favour of the Hyundai Kona.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona). The KGM Torres has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Torres if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Hyundai Kona if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Hyundai Kona: Top CarSorted Score, 63 vs 58

The Hyundai Kona comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (63 vs 58), taking 3 of 7 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: safety (Hyundai Kona ahead by 17), fuel economy (Hyundai Kona ahead by 11), practicality (KGM Torres ahead by 6). The Hyundai Kona will save you roughly $371 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the KGM Torres has a clear edge. The KGM Torres adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Torres and Hyundai Kona?

The Hyundai Kona is the cheapest at $33,950 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Torres by $1,040.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Hyundai Kona uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Hyundai Kona holds a 4-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for KGM Torres, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Torres has the largest boot at 455L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Torres has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Torres has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Torres makes the most power at 120kW. The Hyundai Kona is quickest to 100km/h in 9.9s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs