CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKia Niro vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Kia Niro vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Kia Niro: we're still completing price, turning circle, fuel consumption, CO2 emissions and fuel tank.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecKiaMitsubishi
Price (RRP)TBC$47,790
Fuel typePetrolPlug-in Hybrid
Range (WLTP)55km
Battery13.8 kWh
Electric range55km
Power104kW94kW
0-100 km/h10.4s9.7s
Max DC Charge22kW
10-80% Charge Time38 min
Fuel Economy1.9 kWh/100km
Boot Space451L359L
Towing1,300kg1,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Kia Niro & Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

13.8kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

30 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 22kW · 0–80%

38 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 22kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Kia Niro features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV gets a 8-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Kia Niro stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Kia Niro uses a Petrol I4 + HEV producing 104kW and 265Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed dual clutch to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.4 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV responds with a Petrol making 94kW and 199Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.7 seconds.

The Kia Niro has the clear power advantage at 104kW vs 94kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV is 0.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Kia Niro measures 4,420mm long on a 2,720mm wheelbase, 125mm shorter than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV at 4,545mm (2,670mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia Niro generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 451L in the Kia Niro and 359L in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV, giving the Kia Niro a 92L advantage.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m diameter

Good

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES
10.8m
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV Turning circle · Ø 10.8 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.4 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Niro) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV). The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kia Niro if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV if: You value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Kia Niro has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Kia Niro and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV is the cheapest at $47,790 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV uses the least fuel at 1.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Kia Niro holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia Niro has the largest boot at 451L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Kia Niro makes the most power at 104kW. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV is quickest to 100km/h in 9.7s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best electric SUVs