CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKia Rondo vs GAC M8
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Kia Rondo vs GAC M8

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular People Movers compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKiaGAC
Price (RRP)TBC$76,590
Fuel typePetrolPlug-in Hybrid
Range (WLTP)106km
Electric range106km
Power122kW274kW
0-100 km/h9.5s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km6.1 kWh/100km (as hybrid)
Boot Space492L800L
Towing1,400kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited8yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Kia Rondo & GAC M8

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The GAC M8 counters with Apple CarPlay, wireless charging, heated front seats, power tailgate, GAC Premium audio and ambient lighting that the Kia Rondo does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Kia Rondo uses a 2.0L GDi Petrol producing 122kW and 213Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The GAC M8 responds with a Petrol Turbo making 274kW and 630Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The GAC M8 has the clear power advantage at 274kW vs 122kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Kia Rondo measures 4,525mm long on a 2,750mm wheelbase, 687mm shorter than the GAC M8 at 5,212mm (3,070mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC M8 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 492L in the Kia Rondo and 800L in the GAC M8, giving the GAC M8 a 308L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 12.8m

TightestKia Rondo SiTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Kia Rondo Si
11.0mTighter
Best
GAC M8 PHEV Premium
12.8m
Worst
Kia Rondo Si
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GAC M8 PHEV Premium
12.8m · Large

Based on 12.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKia RondoTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Kia RondoTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
GAC M812.8 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the Kia Rondo and $293/year for the GAC M8. That is a $1,959 annual difference in favour of the GAC M8.

Estimated annual total: $2,252 (Kia Rondo) vs $293 (GAC M8). The GAC M8 saves you roughly $1,959 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Rondo) vs 8 years / 150,000km (GAC M8). The GAC M8 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kia Rondo if: You or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GAC M8 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GAC M8 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The GAC M8 will save you roughly $1,959 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GAC M8 has a clear edge. The GAC M8 adds peace of mind with a longer 8-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Kia Rondo and GAC M8?

The GAC M8 is the cheapest at $76,590 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GAC M8 uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Kia Rondo all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GAC M8 has the largest boot at 800L.

Which can tow the most?

The Kia Rondo has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,400kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GAC M8 has the longest warranty at 8 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC M8 makes the most power at 274kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All People Movers · Best family cars · Best electric cars