CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsLand Rover Range Rover vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Land Rover Range Rover vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Land Rover Range Rover: we're still completing price, kerb weight, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecLand RoverMitsubishi
Price (RRP)TBC$47,790
Fuel typePetrolPlug-in Hybrid
Range (WLTP)55km
Battery13.8 kWh
Electric range55km
Power280kW94kW
0-100 km/h5.6s9.7s
Max DC Charge22kW
10-80% Charge Time38 min
Fuel Economy1.9 kWh/100km
Boot Space1050L359L
Towing3,500kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited10yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Land Rover Range Rover & Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

13.8kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

30 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 22kW · 0–80%

38 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 22kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Land Rover Range Rover stands out with wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate, Meridian audio and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Land Rover Range Rover gets semi-aniline leather upholstery while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV offers cloth. Climate control is 3-zone in the Land Rover Range Rover and 2-zone in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV.

Drivetrain

The Land Rover Range Rover lines up producing 280kW and 550Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.6 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV responds with a 2.4L D4 MPI VVT (IN) making 94kW and 199Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.7 seconds.

The Land Rover Range Rover has the clear power advantage at 280kW vs 94kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Land Rover Range Rover is 4.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Land Rover Range Rover measures 5,052mm long on a 2,997mm wheelbase, 507mm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV at 4,545mm (2,670mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Range Rover generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 1050L in the Land Rover Range Rover and 359L in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV, giving the Land Rover Range Rover a 691L advantage.

For towing, the Land Rover Range Rover leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 2,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 10.9m

TightestMitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ESTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES
10.8mTighter
Best
Land Rover Range Rover Westminster Edition P380 (MY27)
10.9m
Worst
Land Rover Range Rover Westminster Edition P380 (MY27)
10.9m · Good

Based on 10.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEVTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Land Rover Range Rover10.9 m
Good△ 3-point
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEVTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years (Land Rover Range Rover) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV). The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Land Rover Range Rover if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV if: You value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Land Rover Range Rover takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Range Rover has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Land Rover Range Rover and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV is the cheapest at $47,790 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV uses the least fuel at 1.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Land Rover Range Rover and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Land Rover Range Rover has the largest boot at 1050L.

Which can tow the most?

The Land Rover Range Rover has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Land Rover Range Rover makes the most power at 280kW. The Land Rover Range Rover is quickest to 100km/h in 5.6s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best electric SUVs