CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsLDV eT60 vs Mazda BT-50
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

LDV eT60 vs Mazda BT-50

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecLDVMazda
Price (RRP)$99,990$36,400
Range (WLTP)330km
Battery88.6 kWh
Power130kW110kW
0-100 km/h11s10.9s
Max DC Charge80kW
10-80% Charge Time45 min
Fuel Economy7 L/100km
Towing1,000kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 160k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety4 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The LDV eT60 starts from $99,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda BT-50 opens at $36,400. That makes the Mazda BT-50 the more affordable entry point by $63,590.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $109,989 and $40,040 respectively.

The LDV eT60 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda BT-50, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

The Mazda BT-50 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the LDV eT60.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The LDV eT60 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mazda BT-50.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the LDV eT60 and 6 in the Mazda BT-50.

Feature Showdown

The LDV eT60 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda BT-50 gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The LDV eT60 uses a Electric Motor producing 130kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a single-speed fixed gear to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.

The Mazda BT-50 responds with a Diesel making 110kW and 350Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The LDV eT60 has the clear power advantage at 130kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda BT-50 is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The LDV eT60 measures 5,365mm long on a 3,155mm wheelbase, 85mm longer than the Mazda BT-50 at 5,280mm (3,100mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the LDV eT60 generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the Mazda BT-50 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 2,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.4m to 12.6m

Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.4mTighter
Best
LDV eT60 Dual Cab
12.6m
Worst
LDV eT60
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda BT-50
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 160,000km (LDV eT60) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the LDV eT60 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer LDV's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda BT-50 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes