CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsLexus LC vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Lexus LC vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecLexusMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$198,400$189,900
Fuel typePetrolPlug-in Hybrid
Battery6.1 kWh
Electric range15km
Power351kW500kW
0-100 km/h4.7s3.4s
Fuel Economy11.6 L/100km6.1 kWh/100km
Boot Space197L280L
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Lexus LC & Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Lexus LC starts from $198,400 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance opens at $189,900. That makes the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance the more affordable entry point by $8,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $218,240 and $208,890 respectively.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Lexus LC, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance by roughly $15,065 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

6.1kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Lexus LC features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance gets a 11.9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Lexus LC stands out with wireless charging and Mark Levinson audio that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance counters with panoramic roof and Burmester audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Lexus LC gets semi-aniline leather upholstery while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance offers nappa leather.

Drivetrain

The Lexus LC uses a Petrol producing 351kW and 540Nm of torque, sent through a 10-speed auto to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.7 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance responds with a Hybrid making 500kW and 1020Nm, paired to a 9-speed auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 3.4 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the clear power advantage at 500kW vs 351kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Lexus LC measures 4,770mm long on a 2,870mm wheelbase, 72mm shorter than the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance at 4,842mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Lexus LC generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 197L in the Lexus LC and 280L in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance, giving the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance a 83L advantage. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance seats 5 vs 4.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 12.1m

TightestLexus LC LC500Tightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Lexus LC LC500
10.8mTighter
Best
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance Sedan
12.1m
Worst
Lexus LC LC500
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance Sedan
12.1m · Large

Based on 12.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestLexus LCTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Lexus LCTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance12.1 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,306/year for the Lexus LC and $293/year for the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance. That is a $3,013 annual difference in favour of the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance.

Estimated annual total: $3,306 (Lexus LC) vs $293 (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance). The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance saves you roughly $3,013 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Lexus LC) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Lexus LC if: You or prefer Lexus's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance takes 5 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance will save you roughly $3,013 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Lexus LC and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is the cheapest at $189,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Lexus LC by $8,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Lexus LC and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the largest boot at 280L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance makes the most power at 500kW. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is quickest to 100km/h in 3.4s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars · Best electric cars