CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Mazda BT-50 vs Tata Xenon
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda BT-50 vs Tata Xenon

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 29 Aug 2026, price 4 Oct 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Mazda BT-50XS SC 4x26?06
Tata XenonSingle Cab Chassis 4x40?012

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

Specifications in progress

Tata Xenon: we're still completing price, kerb weight, 0-100km/h and CO2 emissions.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMazdaTata
Price (RRP)$38,400TBC
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$38,400RRP

  • with the Tata Xenon's standard kit: $38,400 (nothing to add)

No price

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power120kW110kW
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Towing3,500kg2,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited4yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Mazda BT-50 & Tata Xenon

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Mazda BT-50

  • REC-006284 · published 3 Mar 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left leaf spring bracket may have been insufficiently welded and could crack resulting in a loss of vehicle control.Year range on the notice: 2024
  • REC-005070 · published 10 Mar 2022Due to a manufacturing issue, the transfer case blanking plug may not have been installed correctly during production.Year range on the notice: 2021
  • REC-000899 · published 20 Jan 2021The rear seat belt pretensioner connector lock, may not have been installed correctly during vehicle assembly and will not tension properly.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2021
  • 11 more on the model page.

Tata Xenon

  • REC-003597 · published 17 Dec 2014Sections of pipe delivering brake fluid from the Hydraulic Brake Control Modulator to the left-hand and right-hand front brake calipers can fracture resulting in a brake fluid leak.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mazda BT-50 stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Tata Xenon. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda BT-50 uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout.

The Tata Xenon responds with a 2.2L DICOR making 110kW and 320Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving all four wheels.

The Mazda BT-50 has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda BT-50 measures 5,320mm long on a 3,125mm wheelbase, 195mm longer than the Tata Xenon at 5,125mm (3,150mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Tata Xenon generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Mazda BT-50 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.0m to 12.5m

TightestTata Xenon Single Cab Chassis 4x4Tightest turn at 12.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Tata Xenon Single Cab Chassis 4x4
12.0mTighter
Best
Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5m
Worst
Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Tata Xenon Single Cab Chassis 4x4
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestTata XenonTightest turn at 12.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda BT-5012.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Tata XenonTightest12.0 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Mazda BT-50 and $2,109/year for the Tata Xenon. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Mazda BT-50.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50) vs 4 years / 100,000km (Tata Xenon). The Mazda BT-50 has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —4yr (Tata Xenon).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Tata Xenon if: You or prefer Tata's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The CarSorted Score calls this a draw (70 vs 54). The Mazda BT-50 and Tata Xenon trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mazda BT-50 will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. The Mazda BT-50 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda BT-50 and Tata Xenon?

The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $38,400 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda BT-50 uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Mazda BT-50 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Tata Xenon, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda BT-50 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mazda BT-50 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda BT-50 makes the most power at 120kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · All Cab Chassiss · Best utes in Australia · Best family cars