Mazda CX-30 vs GWM Haval H6GT
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-30 starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the GWM Haval H6GT opens at $44,990. That makes the Mazda CX-30 the more affordable entry point by $15,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $49,489 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mazda CX-30 and GWM Haval H6GT hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 99% for the Mazda CX-30 and 90% for the GWM Haval H6GT.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Haval H6GT packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-30.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-30 and 6 in the GWM Haval H6GT. The GWM Haval H6GT adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-30 misses.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-30 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen, while the GWM Haval H6GT gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mazda CX-30 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the GWM Haval H6GT. The GWM Haval H6GT counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-30 uses a Petrol producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.
The GWM Haval H6GT responds with a Petrol making 179kW and 380Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.
The GWM Haval H6GT has the clear power advantage at 179kW vs 114kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Haval H6GT is 2.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-30 measures 4,395mm long on a 2,655mm wheelbase, 332mm shorter than the GWM Haval H6GT at 4,727mm (2,738mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval H6GT generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 350L in the Mazda CX-30 and 471L in the GWM Haval H6GT, giving the GWM Haval H6GT a 121L advantage.
For towing, the GWM Haval H6GT leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 12.0m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-30 and $1,682/year for the GWM Haval H6GT. That is a $28 annual difference in favour of the GWM Haval H6GT.
Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Mazda CX-30) vs $1,682 (GWM Haval H6GT). The GWM Haval H6GT saves you roughly $28 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H6GT). The GWM Haval H6GT has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the GWM Haval H6GT if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The GWM Haval H6GT takes 6 of 7 key spec categories. The GWM Haval H6GT will save you roughly $28 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval H6GT has a clear edge. The GWM Haval H6GT adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-30 and GWM Haval H6GT?
The Mazda CX-30 is the cheapest at $29,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Haval H6GT by $15,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The GWM Haval H6GT uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-30 and GWM Haval H6GT all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The GWM Haval H6GT has the largest boot at 471L.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Haval H6GT has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Haval H6GT has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The GWM Haval H6GT makes the most power at 179kW. The GWM Haval H6GT is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
