CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-5 vs Nissan X-Trail
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan X-Trail

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaNissan
Price (RRP)$39,990$38,140
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power132kW135kW
0-100 km/h8.7s8s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space466L585L
Towing1,800kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Mazda CX-5 & Nissan X-Trail

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-5 starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Nissan X-Trail opens at $38,140. That makes the Nissan X-Trail the more affordable entry point by $1,850.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $41,954 respectively.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 90% for the Mazda CX-5 and 91% for the Nissan X-Trail.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Nissan X-Trail, against 5 on the Mazda CX-5.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-5 features a 12.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Nissan X-Trail gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-5 uses a Petrol producing 132kW and 242Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.7 seconds.

The Nissan X-Trail lines up making 135kW and 244Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8 seconds.

The Nissan X-Trail has the clear power advantage at 135kW vs 132kW. In the real-world sprint, the Nissan X-Trail is 0.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-5 measures 4,690mm long on a 2,815mm wheelbase, 10mm longer than the Nissan X-Trail at 4,680mm (2,705mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 466L in the Mazda CX-5 and 585L in the Nissan X-Trail, giving the Nissan X-Trail a 119L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1594L vs 782L.

For towing, the Nissan X-Trail leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 11.2m

TightestNissan X-Trail ST 2WD 5-seatTightest turn at 11.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Nissan X-Trail ST 2WD 5-seat
11.1mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.2m
Worst
Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Nissan X-Trail ST 2WD 5-seat
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestNissan X-TrailTightest turn at 11.1m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda CX-511.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Nissan X-TrailTightest11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Mazda CX-5 and $2,109/year for the Nissan X-Trail.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Mazda CX-5) vs $2,109 (Nissan X-Trail). Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-5) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan X-Trail). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-5 if: You or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Nissan X-Trail if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Nissan X-Trail takes 5 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Nissan X-Trail has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail?

The Nissan X-Trail is the cheapest at $38,140 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-5 by $1,850.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-5 uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Nissan X-Trail has the largest boot at 585L.

Which can tow the most?

The Nissan X-Trail has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan X-Trail makes the most power at 135kW. The Nissan X-Trail is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons
Read our in-depth Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan X-Trail analysis

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs