CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-6e vs Volvo XC40
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-6e vs Volvo XC40

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaVolvo
Price (RRP)$53,990$52,900
Range (WLTP)484km
Battery78 kWh
Power190kW145kW
Max DC Charge194kW
10-80% Charge Time15 min
Fuel Economy7.3 L/100km
Boot Space363L452L
Towing1,500kg1,800kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data
V2LYesNo

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-6e starts from $53,990 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC40 opens at $52,900. That makes the Volvo XC40 the more affordable entry point by $1,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $59,389 and $58,190 respectively.

The Mazda CX-6e qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Volvo XC40, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-6e features a 26.5-inch touchscreen, while the Volvo XC40 gets a 9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-6e stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, ventilated seats, power tailgate and V2L that you will not find on the Volvo XC40. The Volvo XC40 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-6e uses a Electric producing 190kW and 290Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout.

The Volvo XC40 responds with a Petrol making 145kW and 300Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels.

The Mazda CX-6e has the clear power advantage at 190kW vs 145kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-6e measures 4,850mm long on a 2,902mm wheelbase, 410mm longer than the Volvo XC40 at 4,440mm (2,702mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-6e generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 363L in the Mazda CX-6e and 452L in the Volvo XC40, giving the Volvo XC40 a 89L advantage.

For towing, the Volvo XC40 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m diameter

Good

Mazda CX-6e GT
11.0m
Mazda CX-6e
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-6e) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC40). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-6e if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo XC40 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mazda CX-6e and Volvo XC40 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Volvo XC40 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-6e and Volvo XC40?

The Volvo XC40 is the cheapest at $52,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-6e by $1,090.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volvo XC40 uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Mazda CX-6e and Volvo XC40 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volvo XC40 has the largest boot at 452L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volvo XC40 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-6e makes the most power at 190kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs