CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMercedes-Benz Vito vs Volkswagen Caddy
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mercedes-Benz Vito vs Volkswagen Caddy

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Vans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMercedes-BenzVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$63,000$57,600
Power84kW
Fuel Economy6.2 L/100km
Boot Space6000L446L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 200k km5yr / unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mercedes-Benz Vito starts from $63,000 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen Caddy opens at $57,600. That makes the Volkswagen Caddy the more affordable entry point by $5,400.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $69,300 and $63,360 respectively.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mercedes-Benz Vito and Volkswagen Caddy hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mercedes-Benz Vito packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Volkswagen Caddy.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 4 in the Mercedes-Benz Vito and 7 in the Volkswagen Caddy.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Volkswagen Caddy counters with Apple CarPlay and wireless charging that the Mercedes-Benz Vito does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mercedes-Benz Vito gets cloth upholstery while the Volkswagen Caddy offers cloth (double grid).

Drivetrain

Detailed powertrain specifications are not yet available for both models.

Space & Comfort

The Mercedes-Benz Vito measures 5,140mm long on a 3,200mm wheelbase, 287mm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy at 4,853mm (2,970mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mercedes-Benz Vito generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 6000L in the Mercedes-Benz Vito and 446L in the Volkswagen Caddy, giving the Mercedes-Benz Vito a 5554L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 12.1m

Mercedes-Benz Vito Panel Van
11.1mTighter
Best
Volkswagen Caddy Caddy TSI220 DSG
12.1m
Worst
Mercedes-Benz Vito
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen Caddy
12.1m · Large

Based on 12.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 200,000km (Mercedes-Benz Vito) vs 5 years (Volkswagen Caddy). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mercedes-Benz Vito if: You need more boot space, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen Caddy if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mercedes-Benz Vito and Volkswagen Caddy trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Mercedes-Benz Vito has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mercedes-Benz Vito and Volkswagen Caddy?

The Volkswagen Caddy is the cheapest at $57,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mercedes-Benz Vito by $5,400.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen Caddy uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mercedes-Benz Vito and Volkswagen Caddy all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz Vito has the largest boot at 6000L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volkswagen Caddy has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Vans