CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG HS vs Honda ZR-V
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG HS vs Honda ZR-V

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGHonda
Price (RRP)$33,990$34,300
Power125kW131kW
0-100 km/h8.6s8s
Fuel Economy6.5 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space507L380L
Towing1,800kg1,500kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The MG HS starts from $33,990 before on-road costs, while the Honda ZR-V opens at $34,300. That makes the MG HS the more affordable entry point by $310.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $37,389 and $37,730 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the MG HS by roughly $1,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the MG HS and Honda ZR-V hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the MG HS and 79% for the Honda ZR-V.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Honda ZR-V packs more ADAS features with 8 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the MG HS.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the MG HS and 7 in the Honda ZR-V.

Feature Showdown

The MG HS features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Honda ZR-V gets a 9-inch display and 10.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG HS stands out with Apple CarPlay and panoramic roof that you will not find on the Honda ZR-V. The Honda ZR-V counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The MG HS uses a Petrol producing 125kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.6 seconds.

The Honda ZR-V responds with a Petrol making 131kW and 240Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8 seconds.

The Honda ZR-V has the clear power advantage at 131kW vs 125kW. In the real-world sprint, the Honda ZR-V is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG HS measures 4,670mm long on a 2,765mm wheelbase, 102mm longer than the Honda ZR-V at 4,568mm (2,655mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG HS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 507L in the MG HS and 380L in the Honda ZR-V, giving the MG HS a 127L advantage.

For towing, the MG HS leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.0m

Honda ZR-V VTi X
10.4mTighter
Best
MG HS Vibe
11.0m
Worst
MG HS
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Honda ZR-V
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,853/year for the MG HS and $2,109/year for the Honda ZR-V. That is a $256 annual difference in favour of the MG HS.

Estimated annual total: $1,853 (MG HS) vs $2,109 (Honda ZR-V). The MG HS saves you roughly $256 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG HS) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Honda ZR-V). The MG HS has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —5yr (Honda ZR-V).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG HS if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Honda ZR-V if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG HS takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The MG HS will save you roughly $256 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG HS has a clear edge. The MG HS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG HS and Honda ZR-V?

The MG HS is the cheapest at $33,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Honda ZR-V by $310.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The MG HS uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MG HS and Honda ZR-V all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG HS has the largest boot at 507L.

Which can tow the most?

The MG HS has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG HS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Honda ZR-V makes the most power at 131kW. The Honda ZR-V is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs