CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›MG U9 vs BYD Shark 6
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG U9 vs BYD Shark 6

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 22 Aug 2026, price 4 Oct 2026

SpecMGBYD
Price (RRP)$52,990$53,900
Fuel typeDieselPlug-in Hybrid
Range (WLTP)—100km
Battery—29.6 kWh
Electric range—100km
Power160kW321kW
0-100 km/h—5.7s
Max DC Charge—55kW
10-80% Charge Time—40 min
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km7.9 kWh/100km (as hybrid)
Towing3,500kg2,500kg
Warranty5yr / No data6yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars
V2LNoYes (6.6kW)

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the MG U9 & BYD Shark 6

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The MG U9 starts from $52,990 before on-road costs, while the BYD Shark 6 opens at $53,900. That makes the MG U9 the more affordable entry point by $910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $58,289 and $59,290 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BYD Shark 6 by roughly $9,365 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the MG U9 and BYD Shark 6 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 91% for the MG U9 and 85% for the BYD Shark 6.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the BYD Shark 6, against 6 on the MG U9.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the MG U9 and 7 in the BYD Shark 6. The BYD Shark 6 adds a 360-degree camera that the MG U9 misses.

Recalls on our record

MG U9

None open on our record

BYD Shark 6

  • REC-006728 · published 21 Sep 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, the spare wheel tray or lifter may have been incorrectly positioned.Year range on the notice: 2024 - 2026

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

29.6kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

28 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 55kW · 0–80%

32 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 55kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The MG U9 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the BYD Shark 6 gets a 15.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BYD Shark 6 counters with head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate, V2L and Dynaudio audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the MG U9 gets artificial leather upholstery while the BYD Shark 6 offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The MG U9 uses a 2.5L Turbo Diesel producing 160kW and 520Nm of torque, sent through a zf 8 speed automatic to a 4x4 layout.

The BYD Shark 6 responds with a Plug-in Hybrid making 321kW and 650Nm, paired to a auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.7 seconds.

The BYD Shark 6 has the clear power advantage at 321kW vs 160kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG U9 measures 5,500mm long on a 3,300mm wheelbase, 43mm longer than the BYD Shark 6 at 5,457mm (3,260mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG U9 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the MG U9 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

13.3m to 13.5m

TightestMG U9 ExploreTightest turn at 13.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
MG U9 Explore
13.3mTighter
Best
BYD Shark 6 Premium
13.5m
Worst
MG U9 Explore
13.3m · Large

Based on 13.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
BYD Shark 6 Premium
13.5m · Large

Based on 13.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMG U9Tightest turn at 13.3m, needs the least road to swing around
MG U9Tightest13.3 m
Large△ 3-point
BYD Shark 613.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the MG U9 and $379/year for the BYD Shark 6. That is a $1,873 annual difference in favour of the BYD Shark 6.

Warranty: 5 years (MG U9) vs 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Shark 6). The BYD Shark 6 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG U9 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BYD Shark 6 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

BYD Shark 6: Top CarSorted Score, 74 vs 69, but the MG U9 is $910 cheaper

The BYD Shark 6 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (74 vs 69), taking 3 of 5 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: technology (BYD Shark 6 ahead by 34), performance (BYD Shark 6 ahead by 24), fuel economy (MG U9 ahead by 20). The BYD Shark 6 will save you roughly $1,873 a year in fuel. The BYD Shark 6 adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG U9 and BYD Shark 6?

The MG U9 is the cheapest at $52,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BYD Shark 6 by $910.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BYD Shark 6 uses the least fuel at 2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: MG U9 and BYD Shark 6 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The MG U9 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The BYD Shark 6 has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The BYD Shark 6 makes the most power at 321kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia