CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG U9 vs BYD Shark 6
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG U9 vs BYD Shark 6

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGBYD
Price (RRP)$52,990$55,900
Range (WLTP)100km
Battery29.6 kWh
Power160kW321kW
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km2 kWh/100km
Towing3,500kg2,500kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km6yr / 150k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The MG U9 starts from $52,990 before on-road costs, while the BYD Shark 6 opens at $55,900. That makes the MG U9 the more affordable entry point by $2,910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $58,289 and $61,490 respectively.

The BYD Shark 6 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The MG U9, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BYD Shark 6 by roughly $10,780 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The MG U9 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the BYD Shark 6 gets a 12.8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG U9 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the BYD Shark 6. The BYD Shark 6 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The MG U9 uses a 2.5L Turbo Diesel producing 160kW and 520Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout.

The BYD Shark 6 responds with a Hybrid making 321kW and 650Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.

The BYD Shark 6 has the clear power advantage at 321kW vs 160kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG U9 measures 5,500mm long on a 3,300mm wheelbase, 43mm longer than the BYD Shark 6 at 5,457mm (3,260mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG U9 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the MG U9 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

13.3m diameter

Large

MG U9 Explore
13.3m
MG U9
13.3m · Large

Based on 13.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the MG U9 and $96/year for the BYD Shark 6. That is a $2,156 annual difference in favour of the BYD Shark 6.

Estimated annual total: $2,252 (MG U9) vs $96 (BYD Shark 6). The BYD Shark 6 saves you roughly $2,156 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG U9) vs 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Shark 6). The MG U9 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG U9 if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BYD Shark 6 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG U9 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The BYD Shark 6 will save you roughly $2,156 a year in fuel. The MG U9 adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes