MG ZS vs Chery Tiggo 4
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
MG ZS
From $22,990
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
81kW
6.7 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
443L
Chery Tiggo 4
From $21,750
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
108kW
7.4 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
380L
Chery Tiggo 4: we're still completing 0-100km/h, turning circle and braked towing.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the MG ZS & Chery Tiggo 4
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The MG ZS starts from $22,990 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 4 opens at $21,750. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 the more affordable entry point by $1,240.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $25,289 and $23,925 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the MG ZS and Chery Tiggo 4 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 81% for the MG ZS and 88% for the Chery Tiggo 4.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the MG ZS and 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4.
Feature Showdown
The MG ZS features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Chery Tiggo 4 gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The MG ZS stands out with Apple CarPlay and power tailgate that you will not find on the Chery Tiggo 4. The Chery Tiggo 4 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The MG ZS uses a Petrol producing 81kW and 140Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout.
The Chery Tiggo 4 responds with a Petrol making 108kW and 210Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels.
The Chery Tiggo 4 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 81kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The MG ZS measures 4,430mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 123mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 4 at 4,307mm (2,610mm wheelbase).
Boot space is 443L in the MG ZS and 380L in the Chery Tiggo 4, giving the MG ZS a 63L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m diameter
Good
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Good
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 9.7 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.8 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the MG ZS and $2,109/year for the Chery Tiggo 4. That is a $199 annual difference in favour of the MG ZS.
Estimated annual total: $1,910 (MG ZS) vs $2,109 (Chery Tiggo 4). The MG ZS saves you roughly $199 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG ZS) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4). The MG ZS has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the MG ZS if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The MG ZS takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The MG ZS will save you roughly $199 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG ZS has a clear edge. The MG ZS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, MG ZS and Chery Tiggo 4?
The Chery Tiggo 4 is the cheapest at $21,750 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG ZS by $1,240.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The MG ZS uses the least fuel at 6.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — MG ZS and Chery Tiggo 4 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The MG ZS has the largest boot at 443L.
Which has the best warranty?
The MG ZS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 4 makes the most power at 108kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
