CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan X-Trail vs KGM Rexton
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan X-Trail vs KGM Rexton

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecNissanKGM
Price (RRP)$37,750$50,000
Power135kW149kW
0-100 km/h8s11.5s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km8.7 L/100km
Boot Space205L236L
Towing1,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Nissan X-Trail starts from $37,750 before on-road costs, while the KGM Rexton opens at $50,000. That makes the Nissan X-Trail the more affordable entry point by $12,250.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,525 and $55,000 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Nissan X-Trail by roughly $1,855 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Nissan X-Trail and KGM Rexton hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Nissan X-Trail and 6 in the KGM Rexton.

Feature Showdown

The Nissan X-Trail features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the KGM Rexton gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Nissan X-Trail stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the KGM Rexton. The KGM Rexton counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, power tailgate and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Nissan X-Trail lines up producing 135kW and 244Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8 seconds.

The KGM Rexton responds with a Turbo DDi Diesel making 149kW and 441Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.

The KGM Rexton has the clear power advantage at 149kW vs 135kW. In the real-world sprint, the Nissan X-Trail is 3.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan X-Trail measures 4,680mm long on a 2,705mm wheelbase, 170mm shorter than the KGM Rexton at 4,850mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Rexton generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 205L in the Nissan X-Trail and 236L in the KGM Rexton, giving the KGM Rexton a 31L advantage. The KGM Rexton seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the KGM Rexton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 2,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.6m

Nissan X-Trail ST 2WD 5-seat
11.0mTighter
Best
KGM Rexton ELX
11.6m
Worst
Nissan X-Trail
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
KGM Rexton
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Nissan X-Trail and $2,480/year for the KGM Rexton. That is a $371 annual difference in favour of the Nissan X-Trail.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Nissan X-Trail) vs $2,480 (KGM Rexton). The Nissan X-Trail saves you roughly $371 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan X-Trail) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Rexton). The KGM Rexton has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan X-Trail if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Rexton if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The KGM Rexton takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Nissan X-Trail will save you roughly $371 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the KGM Rexton has a clear edge. The KGM Rexton adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan X-Trail and KGM Rexton?

The Nissan X-Trail is the cheapest at $37,750 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Rexton by $12,250.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Nissan X-Trail uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Nissan X-Trail and KGM Rexton all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Rexton has the largest boot at 236L.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Rexton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Rexton has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Rexton makes the most power at 149kW. The Nissan X-Trail is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs