CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsToyota LandCruiser 70 vs BMW X2
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota LandCruiser 70 vs BMW X2

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecToyotaBMW
Price (RRP)$75,600$75,900
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power150kW150kW
0-100 km/h12s7.4s
Fuel Economy10.6 L/100km7.5 L/100km
Boot Space560L
Towing3,500kg1,800kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Toyota LandCruiser 70 & BMW X2

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 starts from $75,600 before on-road costs, while the BMW X2 opens at $75,900. That makes the Toyota LandCruiser 70 the more affordable entry point by $300.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $83,160 and $83,490 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BMW X2 by roughly $4,415 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 features a 6.7-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the BMW X2 gets a 10.7-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments.

The BMW X2 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets cloth upholstery while the BMW X2 offers sensatec synthetic leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and 2-zone in the BMW X2.

Drivetrain

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 uses a Diesel producing 150kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12 seconds.

The BMW X2 responds with a Petrol making 150kW and 300Nm, paired to a auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the BMW X2 is 4.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 measures 4,865mm long on a 2,730mm wheelbase, 311mm longer than the BMW X2 at 4,554mm (2,692mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota LandCruiser 70 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.3m to 12.6m

TightestBMW X2 xDrive20i M SportTightest turn at 11.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
BMW X2 xDrive20i M Sport
11.3mTighter
Best
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m
Worst
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
BMW X2 xDrive20i M Sport
11.3m · Average

Based on 11.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestBMW X2Tightest turn at 11.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Toyota LandCruiser 7012.6 m
Large△ 3-point
BMW X2Tightest11.3 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and $2,138/year for the BMW X2. That is a $883 annual difference in favour of the BMW X2.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70) vs 5 years / 999,999km (BMW X2). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BMW X2 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Toyota LandCruiser 70 and BMW X2 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The BMW X2 will save you roughly $883 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota LandCruiser 70 and BMW X2?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 is the cheapest at $75,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BMW X2 by $300.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW X2 uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Toyota LandCruiser 70 and BMW X2 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Wagons · All SUVs · Best family cars · Best mid-size SUVs