CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsVolvo XC40 vs Peugeot 5008
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Volvo XC40 vs Peugeot 5008

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecVolvoPeugeot
Price (RRP)$54,990$55,990
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power145kW107kW
0-100 km/h8.5s11.3s
Fuel Economy7.3 L/100km5.1 L/100km
Boot Space460L348L
Towing2,100kg750kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data4 Stars

Track the Volvo XC40 & Peugeot 5008

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Volvo XC40 starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the Peugeot 5008 opens at $55,990. That makes the Volvo XC40 the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $61,589 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Peugeot 5008 by roughly $3,135 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Volvo XC40 features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Peugeot 5008 gets a 21-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Volvo XC40 stands out with head-up display, heated front seats, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio — features our data doesn't list for the Peugeot 5008. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Volvo XC40 gets textile/leather blend upholstery while the Peugeot 5008 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Volvo XC40 uses a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid producing 145kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Peugeot 5008 responds with a Hybrid making 107kW and 230Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.3 seconds.

The Volvo XC40 has the clear power advantage at 145kW vs 107kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Volvo XC40 is 2.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Volvo XC40 measures 4,440mm long on a 2,702mm wheelbase, 350mm shorter than the Peugeot 5008 at 4,790mm (2,895mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Peugeot 5008 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 460L in the Volvo XC40 and 348L in the Peugeot 5008, giving the Volvo XC40 a 112L advantage. The Peugeot 5008 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Volvo XC40 leads with a 2,100kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 1,350kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.8m

TightestVolvo XC40 Plus B4Tightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volvo XC40 Plus B4
11.0mTighter
Best
Peugeot 5008 Allure Hybrid
11.8m
Worst
Volvo XC40 Plus B4
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Peugeot 5008 Allure Hybrid
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolvo XC40Tightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Volvo XC40Tightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Peugeot 500811.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,081/year for the Volvo XC40 and $1,454/year for the Peugeot 5008. That is a $627 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 5008.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC40) vs 5 years / 200,000km (Peugeot 5008). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Volvo XC40 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Peugeot 5008 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volvo XC40 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Peugeot 5008 will save you roughly $627 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volvo XC40 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Volvo XC40 and Peugeot 5008?

The Volvo XC40 is the cheapest at $54,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Peugeot 5008 by $1,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Peugeot 5008 uses the least fuel at 5.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Peugeot 5008 holds a 4-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Volvo XC40, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volvo XC40 has the largest boot at 460L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volvo XC40 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,100kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo XC40 makes the most power at 145kW. The Volvo XC40 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars