XPeng X9 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Two electric cars go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
XPeng X9: we're still completing turning circle, braked towing and energy consumption.
Ford Mustang Mach-E: we're still completing turning circle, braked towing and energy consumption.
Blank cells below mean we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the XPeng X9 & Ford Mustang Mach-E
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The XPeng X9 starts from $89,900 before on-road costs, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E opens at $80,490. That makes the Ford Mustang Mach-E the more affordable entry point by $9,410.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $98,890 and $88,539 respectively.
Both models currently qualify for the electric-vehicle Fringe Benefits Tax exemption (battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold; battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold), a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
94.8kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 537kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 537kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
How long to charge
88kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 150kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 150kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The XPeng X9 features a 15-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.2-inch digital dash, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E gets a 15.5-inch display and 10.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The XPeng X9 stands out with Apple CarPlay, panoramic roof and V2L — features our data doesn't list for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The Ford Mustang Mach-E counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, heated front seats, ventilated seats and Bang & Olufsen audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the XPeng X9 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The XPeng X9 uses a Electric producing 235kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.2 seconds.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E responds with a Electric Motor making 212kW and 525Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7 seconds.
The XPeng X9 has the clear power advantage at 235kW vs 212kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Ford Mustang Mach-E is 1.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 94.8kWh (XPeng X9) vs 91kWh (Ford Mustang Mach-E), giving WLTP ranges of 535km and 540km. DC fast charging peaks at 537kW (XPeng X9) vs 150kW (Ford Mustang Mach-E).
Space & Comfort
The XPeng X9 measures 5,293mm long on a 3,160mm wheelbase, 580mm longer than the Ford Mustang Mach-E at 4,713mm (2,984mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the XPeng X9 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 721L in the XPeng X9 and 402L in the Ford Mustang Mach-E, giving the XPeng X9 a 319L advantage. The XPeng X9 seats 7 vs 5.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 7 years (XPeng X9) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Mustang Mach-E). The XPeng X9 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the XPeng X9 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer XPeng's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Ford Mustang Mach-E if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The XPeng X9 takes 7 of 10 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the XPeng X9 has a clear edge. The XPeng X9 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, XPeng X9 and Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the cheapest at $80,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the XPeng X9 by $9,410.
Which has the longest driving range?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the most range at 600km (WLTP).
Which charges fastest?
The XPeng X9 accepts the highest DC charging at up to 537kW.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Ford Mustang Mach-E holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for XPeng X9, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The XPeng X9 has the largest boot at 721L.
Which has the best warranty?
The XPeng X9 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The XPeng X9 makes the most power at 235kW. The Ford Mustang Mach-E is quickest to 100km/h in 7s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
