CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Torres vs Nissan X-Trail
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Torres vs Nissan X-Trail

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMNissan
Price (RRP)$34,990$37,750
Power120kW135kW
0-100 km/h11.8s8s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space455L205L
Towing1,500kg1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The KGM Torres starts from $34,990 before on-road costs, while the Nissan X-Trail opens at $37,750. That makes the KGM Torres the more affordable entry point by $2,760.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $38,489 and $41,525 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the KGM Torres and Nissan X-Trail hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Nissan X-Trail packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 2 in the KGM Torres.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the KGM Torres and 7 in the Nissan X-Trail.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Torres features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Nissan X-Trail gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Torres stands out with ambient lighting that you will not find on the Nissan X-Trail. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The KGM Torres uses a Turbo GDi producing 120kW and 280Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.8 seconds.

The Nissan X-Trail lines up making 135kW and 244Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8 seconds.

The Nissan X-Trail has the clear power advantage at 135kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Nissan X-Trail is 3.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Torres measures 4,700mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 20mm longer than the Nissan X-Trail at 4,680mm (2,705mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan X-Trail generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 455L in the KGM Torres and 205L in the Nissan X-Trail, giving the KGM Torres a 250L advantage.

For towing, the Nissan X-Trail leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.2m

Nissan X-Trail ST 2WD 5-seat
11.0mTighter
Best
KGM Torres ELX
11.2m
Worst
KGM Torres
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Nissan X-Trail
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the KGM Torres and $2,109/year for the Nissan X-Trail. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Nissan X-Trail.

Estimated annual total: $2,252 (KGM Torres) vs $2,109 (Nissan X-Trail). The Nissan X-Trail saves you roughly $143 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan X-Trail). The KGM Torres has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Torres if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Nissan X-Trail if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The KGM Torres and Nissan X-Trail trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Nissan X-Trail will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the KGM Torres has a clear edge. The KGM Torres adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Torres and Nissan X-Trail?

The KGM Torres is the cheapest at $34,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan X-Trail by $2,760.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Nissan X-Trail uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — KGM Torres and Nissan X-Trail all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Torres has the largest boot at 455L.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Torres has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Torres has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan X-Trail makes the most power at 135kW. The Nissan X-Trail is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs