Abarth 695 vs GWM ORA
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 4 Sep 2026, price 20 Aug 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$37,900RRP
- no option data for this car
$31,990RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Abarth 695 & GWM ORA
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Abarth 695 starts from $37,900 before on-road costs, while the GWM ORA opens at $31,990. That makes the GWM ORA the more affordable entry point by $5,910.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,690 and $35,189 respectively.
The GWM ORA currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Abarth 695 does not: only battery-electric vehicles qualify.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Abarth 695
None open on our record
GWM ORA
- REC-005843 · published 4 Dec 2023Due to a programming issue, if the operator removes the charging cable without cancelling the charge, an electrical arc between the charging plug and the vehicle may occur.Year range on the notice: 2023
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
59kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 80kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (6.6kW AC, 80kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Abarth 695 features a 7-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the GWM ORA gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Abarth 695 stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the GWM ORA. The GWM ORA counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Abarth 695 gets fabric upholstery while the GWM ORA offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The Abarth 695 uses a Turbo T-Jet producing 132kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.
The GWM ORA responds with a Electric making 126kW and 250Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.4 seconds.
The Abarth 695 has the clear power advantage at 132kW vs 126kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Abarth 695 is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Abarth 695 measures 3,657mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 578mm shorter than the GWM ORA at 4,235mm (2,650mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM ORA generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 695 and 228L in the GWM ORA, giving the GWM ORA a 43L advantage. The GWM ORA seats 5 vs 4.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.3m to 11.2m
Based on 9.3m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 695) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM ORA). The GWM ORA has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Abarth 695 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the GWM ORA if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
GWM ORA: Top CarSorted Score, 74 vs 63
The GWM ORA comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (74 vs 63), taking 3 of 5 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: reliability (GWM ORA ahead by 18), value (GWM ORA ahead by 13), performance (Abarth 695 ahead by 12). If boot space matters, the GWM ORA has a clear edge. The GWM ORA adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Abarth 695 and GWM ORA?
The GWM ORA is the cheapest at $31,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Abarth 695 by $5,910.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Abarth 695 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
GWM ORA holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Abarth 695, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The GWM ORA has the largest boot at 228L with the seats up.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM ORA has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Abarth 695 makes the most power at 132kW. The Abarth 695 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
