CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBYD Shark 6 vs KGM Musso
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BYD Shark 6 vs KGM Musso

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

BYD Shark 6
Draw
BYD

BYD Shark 6

From $55,900

Body

Ute

Fuel type

Plug-in Hybrid

Engine

Hybrid

Power

321kW

Economy

2 kWh/100km

Safety

5★ ANCAP

Boot

View full details
KGM Musso
Draw
KGM

KGM Musso

From $40,500

Body

Ute

Fuel type

Diesel

Engine

Turbo DDi Diesel

Power

133kW

Economy

8.6 L/100km

Safety

ANCAP: no data

Boot

532L

View full details
SpecBYDKGM
Price (RRP)$55,900$40,500
Fuel typePlug-in HybridDiesel
Range (WLTP)100km
Battery29.6 kWh
Electric range100km
Power321kW133kW
0-100 km/h10.9s
Max DC Charge55kW
Fuel Economy7.9 kWh/100km (as hybrid)8.6 L/100km
Boot Space532L
Towing2,500kg3,500kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data
V2LYes (6.6kW)No

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the BYD Shark 6 & KGM Musso

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BYD Shark 6 starts from $55,900 before on-road costs, while the KGM Musso opens at $40,500. That makes the KGM Musso the more affordable entry point by $15,400.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $61,490 and $44,550 respectively.

The BYD Shark 6 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The KGM Musso, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BYD Shark 6 by roughly $10,360 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

29.6kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

28 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 55kW · 0–80%

32 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 55kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The BYD Shark 6 features a 12.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the KGM Musso gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BYD Shark 6 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, V2L and Dynaudio audio that you will not find on the KGM Musso. The KGM Musso counters with Apple CarPlay and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BYD Shark 6 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the KGM Musso offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the BYD Shark 6 and 1-zone in the KGM Musso.

Drivetrain

The BYD Shark 6 uses a Hybrid producing 321kW and 650Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout.

The KGM Musso responds with a Turbo DDi Diesel making 133kW and 400Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The BYD Shark 6 has the clear power advantage at 321kW vs 133kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BYD Shark 6 measures 5,413mm long on a 3,260mm wheelbase, 308mm longer than the KGM Musso at 5,105mm (3,000mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD Shark 6 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the KGM Musso leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m to 13.5m

TightestKGM Musso ELXTightest turn at 12.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
KGM Musso ELX
12.2mTighter
Best
BYD Shark 6 Dynamic Cab-Chassis
13.5m
Worst
BYD Shark 6 Dynamic Cab-Chassis
13.5m · Large

Based on 13.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
KGM Musso ELX
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKGM MussoTightest turn at 12.2m, needs the least road to swing around
BYD Shark 613.5 m
Large△ 3-point
KGM MussoTightest12.2 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $379/year for the BYD Shark 6 and $2,451/year for the KGM Musso. That is a $2,072 annual difference in favour of the BYD Shark 6.

Estimated annual total: $379 (BYD Shark 6) vs $2,451 (KGM Musso). The BYD Shark 6 saves you roughly $2,072 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Shark 6) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso). The KGM Musso has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BYD Shark 6 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Musso if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The BYD Shark 6 and KGM Musso trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The BYD Shark 6 will save you roughly $2,072 a year in fuel. The KGM Musso adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BYD Shark 6 and KGM Musso?

The KGM Musso is the cheapest at $40,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BYD Shark 6 by $15,400.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BYD Shark 6 uses the least fuel at 2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — BYD Shark 6 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Musso has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Musso has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The BYD Shark 6 makes the most power at 321kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia