CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery C5 vs Mahindra XUV 3XO
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery C5 vs Mahindra XUV 3XO

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryMahindra
Price (RRP)$27,500$21,800
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power108kW82kW
0-100 km/h8.5s10.4s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km6.5 L/100km
Boot Space370L364L
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Chery C5 & Mahindra XUV 3XO

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chery C5 starts from $27,500 before on-road costs, while the Mahindra XUV 3XO opens at $21,800. That makes the Mahindra XUV 3XO the more affordable entry point by $5,700.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $29,990 for the Chery C5 and $23,990 for the Mahindra XUV 3XO.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Chery C5 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mahindra XUV 3XO gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mahindra XUV 3XO counters with wireless charging that the Chery C5 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Chery C5 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Mahindra XUV 3XO offers cloth. Climate control is 1-zone in the Chery C5 and 2-zone in the Mahindra XUV 3XO.

Drivetrain

The Chery C5 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed dual clutch to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Mahindra XUV 3XO responds with a Petrol making 82kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.4 seconds.

The Chery C5 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 82kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery C5 is 1.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery C5 measures 4,351mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 361mm longer than the Mahindra XUV 3XO at 3,990mm (2,600mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery C5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 370L in the Chery C5 and 364L in the Mahindra XUV 3XO, giving the Chery C5 a 6L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.2m

TightestMahindra XUV 3XO AX5LTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L
10.6mTighter
Best
Chery C5 Urban
11.2m
Worst
Chery C5 Urban
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMahindra XUV 3XOTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Chery C511.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Mahindra XUV 3XOTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Chery C5 and $1,853/year for the Mahindra XUV 3XO. That is a $114 annual difference in favour of the Mahindra XUV 3XO.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Chery C5) vs $1,853 (Mahindra XUV 3XO). The Mahindra XUV 3XO saves you roughly $114 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery C5) vs 7 years / 150,000km (Mahindra XUV 3XO). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery C5 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mahindra XUV 3XO if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Mahindra's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery C5 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Mahindra XUV 3XO will save you roughly $114 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery C5 and Mahindra XUV 3XO?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO is the cheapest at $21,800 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery C5 by $5,700.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery C5 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery C5 has the largest boot at 370L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery C5 makes the most power at 108kW. The Chery C5 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs