CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 4 vs Mazda CX-3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 4 vs Mazda CX-3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryMazda
Price (RRP)$23,990$27,800
Power108kW110kW
0-100 km/h10.5s10.9s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km6 L/100km
Boot Space358L350L
Towing1,500kg1,000kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 starts from $23,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-3 opens at $27,800. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 the more affordable entry point by $3,810.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $26,389 and $30,580 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-3 by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Chery Tiggo 4 and Mazda CX-3 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 4 and 99% for the Mazda CX-3.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 4 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mazda CX-3.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 and 6 in the Mazda CX-3.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-3 gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 4 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-3 responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 195Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-3 has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 108kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 4 is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 4 measures 4,307mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 32mm longer than the Mazda CX-3 at 4,275mm (2,570mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 4 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 and 350L in the Mazda CX-3, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 a 8L advantage.

For towing, the Chery Tiggo 4 leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.6m

Chery Tiggo 4 Urban
10.6mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-3 G20 Pure
10.6m
Best
Chery Tiggo 4
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-3
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 and $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-3. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-3.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Chery Tiggo 4) vs $1,710 (Mazda CX-3). The Mazda CX-3 saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-3). The Chery Tiggo 4 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-3 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 4 takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-3 will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. The Chery Tiggo 4 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs