CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›CUPRA Terramar vs Mazda 6e
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

CUPRA Terramar vs Mazda 6e

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 31 Aug 2026, price 21 Oct 2026

CUPRA Terramar
CUPRA

CUPRA Terramar

20 of 27 standard · no option data · 7 no data

From

$53,990

RRP, before on-road costs

Body
SUV
Fuel type
Petrol
Engine
4-cyl Turbo Petrol MHEV
Power
110kW
Economy
5.7 L/100km
Safety
5★ ANCAP
Boot (seats up)
508L
77CarSorted Score / 100
Winner
Mazda 6e
Mazda

Mazda 6e

22 of 27 standard · no option data · 5 no data

From

$49,990

RRP, before on-road costs

Body
Hatchback
Fuel type
Electric
Engine
Electric
Power
190kW
Economy
No data
Safety
5★ ANCAP
Boot (seats up)
337L
80CarSorted Score / 100

Top CarSorted Score, 80 vs 77

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
CUPRA TerramarS11?01
Mazda 6eGT11?01

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecCUPRAMazda
Price (RRP)$53,990$49,990
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$53,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

$49,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePetrolElectric
Range (WLTP)—560km
Battery—78 kWh
Power110kW190kW
0-100 km/h9.3s—
Max DC Charge—194kW
10-80% Charge Time—24 min
Fuel Economy5.7 L/100km—
Boot (seats up)508L337L
Towing1,800kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars
V2LNoYes (3.5kW)

Track the CUPRA Terramar & Mazda 6e

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The CUPRA Terramar starts from $53,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda 6e opens at $49,990. That makes the Mazda 6e the more affordable entry point by $4,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $58,490 for the CUPRA Terramar and $52,990 for the Mazda 6e.

The Mazda 6e currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The CUPRA Terramar does not: only battery-electric vehicles qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the CUPRA Terramar and Mazda 6e hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the CUPRA Terramar and 93% for the Mazda 6e.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 9 of 10 key ADAS systems on the CUPRA Terramar, against 7 on the Mazda 6e.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the CUPRA Terramar and 9 in the Mazda 6e.

Recalls on our record

CUPRA Terramar

  • REC-006614 · published 2 Jun 2026Due to a software issue, under certain driving conditions the electric power steering system may become temporarily inoperable.Year range on the notice: 2025
  • REC-006608 · published 12 May 2026Electric power steering software fault can disable assistanceYear range on the notice: 2024 - 2026

Mazda 6e

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

78kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 15m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 194kW · 0–80%

24 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 194kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The CUPRA Terramar features a 12.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda 6e gets a 14.6-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The CUPRA Terramar stands out with heated front seats and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Mazda 6e. The Mazda 6e counters with wireless charging, panoramic roof, ventilated seats and V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The CUPRA Terramar uses a 4-cyl Turbo Petrol MHEV producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.3 seconds.

The Mazda 6e responds with a Electric making 190kW and 290Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels.

The Mazda 6e has the clear power advantage at 190kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The CUPRA Terramar measures 4,519mm long on a 2,681mm wheelbase, 402mm shorter than the Mazda 6e at 4,921mm (2,895mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda 6e generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 508L in the CUPRA Terramar and 337L in the Mazda 6e, giving the CUPRA Terramar a 171L advantage.

For towing, the CUPRA Terramar leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.4m

TightestMazda 6e GTTightest turn at 11.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda 6e GT
11.2mTighter
Best
CUPRA Terramar S
11.4m
Worst
CUPRA Terramar S
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda 6e GT
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda 6eTightest turn at 11.2m, needs the least road to swing around
CUPRA Terramar11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Mazda 6eTightest11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (CUPRA Terramar) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda 6e). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the CUPRA Terramar if: You need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer CUPRA's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda 6e if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Mazda 6e: Top CarSorted Score, 80 vs 77

The Mazda 6e comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (80 vs 77), taking 4 of 6 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: value (Mazda 6e ahead by 13), practicality (CUPRA Terramar ahead by 11), reliability (Mazda 6e ahead by 9). If boot space matters, the CUPRA Terramar has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, CUPRA Terramar and Mazda 6e?

The Mazda 6e is the cheapest at $49,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the CUPRA Terramar by $4,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The CUPRA Terramar uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: CUPRA Terramar and Mazda 6e all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The CUPRA Terramar has the largest boot at 508L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The CUPRA Terramar has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda 6e makes the most power at 190kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · All Hatchbacks · Best hybrid cars · Best electric cars