CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGAC Emzoom vs Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GAC Emzoom vs Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGACChery
Price (RRP)$25,590$27,500
Power125kW71kW
0-100 km/h7.8s10.5s
Fuel Economy6.6 L/100km5.4 L/100km
Boot Space341L358L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 150k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The GAC Emzoom starts from $25,590 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid opens at $27,500. That makes the GAC Emzoom the more affordable entry point by $1,910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $28,149 and $30,250 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the GAC Emzoom and Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GAC Emzoom packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GAC Emzoom and 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Feature Showdown

The GAC Emzoom features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GAC Emzoom stands out with wireless charging, panoramic roof, power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GAC Emzoom gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The GAC Emzoom uses a Petrol Turbo producing 125kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.8 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid responds with a Petrol I4 + HEV making 71kW and 120Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.

The GAC Emzoom has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 71kW. In the real-world sprint, the GAC Emzoom is 2.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GAC Emzoom measures 4,410mm long on a 2,650mm wheelbase, 80mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid at 4,330mm (2,604mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC Emzoom generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 341L in the GAC Emzoom and 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid a 17L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.2m

Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid Urban
10.6mTighter
Best
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m
Worst
GAC Emzoom
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,881/year for the GAC Emzoom and $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $1,881 (GAC Emzoom) vs $1,539 (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (GAC Emzoom) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GAC Emzoom if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The GAC Emzoom and Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GAC Emzoom and Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid?

The GAC Emzoom is the cheapest at $25,590 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid by $1,910.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GAC Emzoom and Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the largest boot at 358L.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC Emzoom makes the most power at 125kW. The GAC Emzoom is quickest to 100km/h in 7.8s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs