GWM Haval H6GT vs Mazda CX-80
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The GWM Haval H6GT starts from $44,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-80 opens at $64,490. That makes the GWM Haval H6GT the more affordable entry point by $19,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $49,489 and $70,939 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GWM Haval H6GT by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the GWM Haval H6GT and Mazda CX-80 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 90% for the GWM Haval H6GT and 92% for the Mazda CX-80.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Haval H6GT packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Mazda CX-80.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GWM Haval H6GT and 6 in the Mazda CX-80. The GWM Haval H6GT adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-80 misses.
Feature Showdown
The GWM Haval H6GT features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-80 gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GWM Haval H6GT stands out with head-up display, wireless charging and heated front seats that you will not find on the Mazda CX-80. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The GWM Haval H6GT uses a Petrol producing 179kW and 380Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.
The Mazda CX-80 responds with a Petrol making 209kW and 450Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9 seconds.
The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 179kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Haval H6GT is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The GWM Haval H6GT measures 4,727mm long on a 2,738mm wheelbase, 263mm shorter than the Mazda CX-80 at 4,990mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 471L in the GWM Haval H6GT and 550L in the Mazda CX-80, giving the Mazda CX-80 a 79L advantage. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Mazda CX-80 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m to 12.0m
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the GWM Haval H6GT and $2,024/year for the Mazda CX-80. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the GWM Haval H6GT.
Estimated annual total: $1,682 (GWM Haval H6GT) vs $2,024 (Mazda CX-80). The GWM Haval H6GT saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H6GT) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80). The GWM Haval H6GT has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the GWM Haval H6GT if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The GWM Haval H6GT takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The GWM Haval H6GT will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-80 has a clear edge. The GWM Haval H6GT adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, GWM Haval H6GT and Mazda CX-80?
The GWM Haval H6GT is the cheapest at $44,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-80 by $19,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The GWM Haval H6GT uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — GWM Haval H6GT and Mazda CX-80 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-80 has the largest boot at 550L.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Haval H6GT has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Haval H6GT has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW. The GWM Haval H6GT is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
