CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid vs Mazda CX-80
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid vs Mazda CX-80

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryMazda
Price (RRP)$52,990$64,490
Range (WLTP)90km
Battery19 kWh
Power105kW209kW
0-100 km/h9s
Max DC Charge41kW
Fuel Economy1.3 kWh/100km7.1 L/100km
Boot Space550L
Towing1,500kg2,000kg
Warranty7yr / unlimited5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid starts from $52,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-80 opens at $64,490. That makes the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $11,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $58,289 and $70,939 respectively.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda CX-80, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid by roughly $9,810 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid features a 15.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-80 gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid stands out with wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, Sony audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mazda CX-80. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid uses a 1.5L Turbocharged Petrol producing 105kW and 215Nm of torque, sent through a dedicated hybrid transmission (3dht) to a FWD layout.

The Mazda CX-80 responds with a Petrol making 209kW and 450Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 105kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid measures 4,800mm long on a 2,750mm wheelbase, 190mm shorter than the Mazda CX-80 at 4,990mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Mazda CX-80 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m diameter

Average

Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
11.8m
Mazda CX-80
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $62/year for the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid and $2,024/year for the Mazda CX-80. That is a $1,962 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $62 (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid) vs $2,024 (Mazda CX-80). The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid saves you roughly $1,962 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80). The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $1,962 a year in fuel. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid and Mazda CX-80?

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid is the cheapest at $52,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-80 by $11,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid uses the least fuel at 1.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-80 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has the longest warranty at 7 years.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs