Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid vs Skoda Kodiaq
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid
From $49,550
SUV
Plug-in Hybrid
1.5L Turbocharged Petrol
225kW
1.5 kWh/100km
ANCAP: no data
143L
Skoda Kodiaq
From $54,990
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
140kW
9.2 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
289L
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid & Skoda Kodiaq
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid starts from $49,550 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Kodiaq opens at $54,990. That makes the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $5,440.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $54,505 and $60,489 respectively.
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Skoda Kodiaq, as a petrol model, does not qualify.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid by roughly $12,750 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
19kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 41kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 41kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid features a 15.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Kodiaq gets a 13-inch display and 10-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid stands out with wireless charging, panoramic roof, Sony audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Skoda Kodiaq. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Skoda Kodiaq offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid and 3-zone in the Skoda Kodiaq.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid uses a 1.5L Turbocharged Petrol producing 225kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a dedicated hybrid transmission (3dht) to a FWD layout.
The Skoda Kodiaq responds with a Petrol making 140kW and 320Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.9 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 225kW vs 140kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid measures 4,800mm long on a 2,750mm wheelbase, 42mm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq at 4,758mm (2,791mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kodiaq generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 143L in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid and 289L in the Skoda Kodiaq, giving the Skoda Kodiaq a 146L advantage.
For towing, the Skoda Kodiaq leads with a 2,300kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 800kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m diameter
Average
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator — U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Average
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 9.7 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m — clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m — 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.9 m wide — fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m — swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m — no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $72/year for the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid and $2,622/year for the Skoda Kodiaq. That is a $2,550 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid.
Estimated annual total: $72 (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid) vs $2,622 (Skoda Kodiaq). The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid saves you roughly $2,550 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $2,550 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Kodiaq has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid and Skoda Kodiaq?
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid is the cheapest at $49,550 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Kodiaq by $5,440.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid uses the least fuel at 1.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Skoda Kodiaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Kodiaq has the largest boot at 289L.
Which can tow the most?
The Skoda Kodiaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,300kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid makes the most power at 225kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
